Monday, 23 January 2023

Paternoster

A Sermon for Bloomsbury Central Baptist Church
29 January 2022


Matthew 6.5-18   
Deuteronomy 6.4-9 

When Liz and I were undergraduates
            at Sheffield University back in the early ’90s,
the Biblical Studies department where we were studying
            was situated on floor ten of a building known as the Arts Tower.
 
This Grade 2 listed 1960s skyscraper dominates the skyline of Sheffield,
            and is loved and loathed in equal measure,
            in a similar way to that that in which the Barbican divides opinion in London
                         – but the Arts Tower is steel and glass, rather than brutalist concrete.
 
Anyway, there were a couple of normal lifts,
            but the main way of getting around within the building
            was to use a thing called the Paternoster Lift.
 
Has anyone ever seen or been in one of these things?
            It’s like a giant bicycle chain of carriages,
                        each one big enough for two people,
            that runs from the bottom to the top of the building,
                        in constant, if rather slow, motion.
 
The carriages have no doors,
            and you simply wait for a vacant car to come along, and step on,
            only to then step off at the floor you want.
 
It’s both brilliant and terrifying,
            and still going strong I’m told even all these years on.
Of course, as you step into the void from the tenth floor or higher,
            anticipating the imminent arrival of something firm to stand on,
            you mutter a little prayer to yourself.
 
Hence, so the rumour goes, it is a Paternoster Lift
            because, for those of you whose Latin is a little rusty,
            Pater Noster is Latin for ‘Our Father’,
            the opening words of the Lord’s Prayer in Matthew’s gospel.
 
Of course, it may be that the circular motion of the carriages
            is reminiscent of counting the beads in a rosary,
            but I think I prefer the nervous prayer explanation!
 
But I wonder if the Paternoster lift can tell us something significant
            about the way people often use the Lord’s Prayer?
 
I suspect that for many, maybe even for some of us,
            it’s a little rote-prayer, learned in childhood and recited when needed,
                        either because it’s that point in the service again,
                        or because it’s that point in the rosary again,
                        or because some other pressing need for prayer has triggered it.
 
For many of people, particularly those who have had a Roman Catholic upbringing,
            just saying ‘Pater Noster’ is enough
            – the opening words infer the rest of the prayer;
and I think this tells us something profound
            about the nature of the Lord’s Prayer;
which is that the way it begins is of the utmost importance.
 
If the Lord’s Prayer is the definitive Christian prayer,
            I’m going to suggest that the opening words
                        are the most definitive phrase within it.
            They define what follows.
 
The practice of using the opening couple of words
            to signify that which follows
            is far from unique to the Lord’s Prayer
– the Jews did it, for example, with the prayer known as The Shema,
            which we had read to us earlier from the book of Deuteronomy.
 
In many ways, the Shema is a kind of fore-runner to the Lord’s Prayer,
            and it similarly gets its name from its opening words
                        – Shema in Hebrew means ‘hear’,
                        and indeed the prayer begins, ‘Hear, O Israel’…
 
How things begin is important,
            and the Lord’s Prayer begins, in Matthew’s gospel, with ‘Our Father’.
 
Interestingly, in Luke’s gospel, it just begins with just ‘Father’,
            and this is the word I want us to focus on for a few minutes this morning.
 
You see, the language we use about God,
            the words we use to describe or address God,
            reveal a lot about who we think God is.
 
The Lord’s prayer, for example, could have begun
            ‘Our God’, a fairly neutral statement;
                        or possibly ‘Our Lord’, or even ‘Our King’,
                        both of which would suggest far great levels of authoritarian divinity.
            ‘Our King’ would actually have made a lot of sense,
                        given that part of what follows is a prayer for God’s ‘Kingdom’ to come
                                    on earth as it is in heaven.
 
But no, the Lord’s Prayer begins by turning to God
            as the heavenly ‘Father’ of those offering the prayer.
 
The Jews, of course, had a tradition of praying to God as ‘Father’,
            and although it’s not found frequently in the Old Testament,
            it certainly formed part of the devotional tradition of Judaism
                        within which Jesus grew up.
 
The most common images for God that we find in the Hebrew Bible
            tend to revolve around God as Creator, King, or Judge,
and although God as Father is there, it isn’t common.
 
Possibly this was a reaction against those other ancient religions
            that believed in the notion of divine parenthood,
                        with the gods having sex with humans
                        who then give birth to superhero-type offspring.
            Actually, there is an ancient echo of this in the Genesis story of the Nephilim,
                        but that’s another sermon for another day.
 
Anyway, when it comes to Israel’s understanding of God as father,
            there are two key aspects to this.
 
Firstly, Israel considered itself a ‘son’ adopted by God,
            particularly so with regard to God’s decisive action
            in bringing them from slavery in Egypt.
 
So, Moses tells the Pharaoh
Exodus 4:22-23  Then you shall say to Pharaoh,
            'Thus says the LORD: Israel is my firstborn son. 
23 I said to you, "Let my son go that he may worship me."'
 
And this idea of Israel as God’s child
            can be found elsewhere too the Old Testament,
                        from Hosea (11.1) to Isaiah (54.5-9), to the Psalms (103.13-16).
 
But the second way in which Father imagery is used of God, particularly in prayer,
            is the way God is spoken of as ‘Father’ to the king of Israel,
for example in 2 Samuel (7.14) God promises to be a father to the King,
            and that the King will be his special son.
 
The combination of these two facets of the fatherhood of God,
            firstly as the convenantal father
                        who rescued them from Egypt and adopted them,
            and secondly as the father of the King of Israel,
directly feed into the way
            Jesus would have understood the phrase ‘Our Father’,
            when it is used of God.
 
God is the father of Israel collectively,
            but also specifically God is the father of its key figurehead,
            the king of the line of David.
 
So, in Matthew’s gospel when Jesus is referred to as the Son of David,
            there is a sense in which he is being cast
                        as the key figurehead of the new Christian community
            – it is not merely David who is his ancestor,
                        but also God who is his father.
 
And this idea of Jesus as the son of God
            becomes important for Matthew
because it defines the community of those around Jesus
            as being those who see themselves as children of God.
 
In 12.50, Matthew records Jesus as teaching that
            ‘whoever does the will of my Father in heaven
            is my brother and sister and mother’.
 
The point is clear: those who, like Jesus, obey their heavenly father
            become, like him, children of God.
 
Just as God was the father of the King, and also of all Israel,
            so God is the father of Jesus, and also of all his disciples too.
 
So, in the sermon on the mount, where we find the Lord’s Prayer,
            we also find Jesus telling his disciples several times
            that God is ‘their’ father in Heaven (5.16, 45; 6.1; 7.11; cf. 18.14; 23.9).
 
And this sense that they have been adopted as children of God,
            as Israel of old was adopted as a son of God,
is seen to carry with it a responsibility to live accordingly
            – the children are expected to behave
                        in ways that bring honour to their heavenly Father,
            for example by doing good deeds.
 
In this, of course, the disciples are being contrasted with the Pharisees,
            who are presented as having betrayed their status as children of God
                        by focusing on outward piety
                        rather than on genuine transformation of the heart.
 
So, for us to say ‘Our Father’, at the beginning of the Lord’s prayer,
            is for us to take a momentous step of faith.
 
We are not merely naming God as Father in some generic sense,
            we are specifically identifying ourselves as his children.
 
We are, in effect, naming ourselves as the new Israel,
            adopted by the God who brings us too from slavery to freedom,
            and who releases us from our enslavements
                        to those desires and temptations
                        that diminish the image of the Father in us.
 
And this has implications for the way we will live
            – we must be those in whose lives good deeds are visible,
                        those who imitate the likeness of our heavenly father.
 
As Jesus rather uncompromisingly puts it in the Sermon on the Mount,
            ‘Be perfect, as your heavenly father is perfect.’ (5.48).
 
We should not pray, ‘Our Father’, lightly!
 
But there is another side to being an adopted child of God,
            and that is that we are the beneficiaries of the fatherly care of God.
 
Not in the sense that God will automatically give his children everything they ask for
            – what kind of good father does that?
But rather in the sense that God is attentive to our needs,
            knowing what we need before we even ask him (Matt. 6.8).
 
In so many ways, this can be a freeing insight
            for the person who wants to come before their heavenly father in prayer.
 
I don’t know about you, but I’ve grown weary of the kind of prayer
            that seeks to articulate all my needs and desires to God.
 
When I was a teenager I was encouraged to keep a prayer list,
            and to cross things off it when they were answered.
Honestly, it was one of the worst things I ever did for my prayer life
            – because it reduced prayer to a functional activity,
                        as if by my naming of things in some spiritual formula
                        I could in some way affect their outcome.
 
I’ll say this as bluntly as I know how:
            I don’t think prayer changes God,
                        or God’s mind, or God’s activity in the world.
 
In fact, I’ll go further:
            I have a suspicion that to utter a prayer list
                        according to some set incantation such as,
                                    ‘in the name of Jesus Christ, Amen’,
                        might actually be sorcery.
            I am deeply concerned when humans think they can control God
                        by invoking prayer rituals or practices.
 
I want prayer to be so much more
            than presenting God with a shopping list of my needs;
and I don’t want the guilt that comes
            from missing something or someone out of my prayer list;
and surely God, if God exists, just knows this stuff already?!
 
Well, yes he does, as Jesus says,
Matthew 6:7-8  When you are praying, do not heap up empty phrases as the Gentiles do; for they think that they will be heard because of their many words.  8 Do not be like them, for your Father knows what you need before you ask him.
 
God knows our needs before we do,
            and so prayer can become something very different
            to just telling God our needs in the hope that he will meet them.
 
Prayer to God our Father
            is prayer offered to the one who already knows us
                        better than we know ourselves,
            and who loves us more than we love ourselves.
 
Such prayer is not about changing God,
            or changing the outworking of God’s love in the world.
It is about bringing ourselves into alignment with the love of God
            who is reaching out to us, and through us, and with us,
            to draw the world to himself.
 
And, as Jesus himself discovered in the Garden of Gethsemane,
            prayer does not stop the difficult stuff happening to us or those we love.
Contemplating the horrors of the cross that lay before him, Matthew tells us
            that Jesus ‘threw himself on the ground and prayed,
                        “My Father, if it is possible, let this cup pass from me;
                        yet not what I want but what you want.” (Matthew 26:39)
 
The prayer in the Garden did not avert the cross,
            but it did allow Jesus to embrace it.
And this is what it means for us to pray to God our Father;
            the future is still before us, with all the joys and sorrows that it holds,
            but in prayer to our loving Father,
                        we are drawn into the all-embracing love of God.
 
And it is we who are changed by this prayerful encounter.
            It is we who are called to set aside our selfishness, and our fear,
                        and all the pretentions that mask the image of God in our lives.
 
He is our Father, and he welcomes us into his presence
            as we draw near to him in prayer.
 
And I know the point I’m about to make has been made many times before,
            but it is worth making again.
For some of us, the image of God as Father is deeply problematic.
 
Human fathers, even at their very best,
            will only ever by poor reflections of God the Father,
and at their worst they can be terrible perversions
            of what Godly paternal love should look like.
 
Some of us here today will have suffered violence and abuse
            from fathers who should have been different.
Some of us will have suffered the absence of a father through our formative years.
 
So I’m just going to say, if Father God doesn’t work for you, that’s fine.
            It’s only an image, it’s just language.
All language of God is inadequate anyway, so feel free to substitute.
            If Mother works better for you, go with that.
                        Or maybe ‘Idealised Parent’?
                        Or whatever language captures for you
                                    the experience of being loved unconditionally
                                    by one who longs for your presence.
 
If we’re going to hallow the name of God,
            then we’d better use a name that is worth hallowing.
 
But for now, if you’ll allow me, I’ll stay with the language of God as Father;
            as it’s there in the text, and it carries helpful meaning for many, if not all.
 
So, ‘pray in this way’, says Jesus: ‘Our Father in heaven…’
 
And here we hit straight up against another preconception of God
            that can be less than helpful.
 
If God is our Father in heaven,
            does this mean that the one we are praying to
                        is some kind of absentee God,
            sitting up there, metaphorically speaking, on a cloud
                        and attended by putti and cherubs?
 
Certainly, if the medieval artwork of God-on-high is to be believed,
            that is exactly what ‘Our Father which art in Heaven’ looks like.
 
However we have to recognise that what is at play here
            is a pre-scientific cosmology
                        that might have worked two thousand years ago,
            but doesn’t really work so well for us today.
 
In the ancient Jewish spiritual tradition,
            they pictured the heavens as a kind of reflection of an earthly royal court.
So, just as a king on earth had courtiers and attendants,
            and sat on a raised throne indicating his power and authority,
so they saw God sitting on his throne up in heaven,
            surrounded by the heavenly host of his attendants and armies.
 
And heaven was very definitely ‘up’ there somewhere, high above the clouds.
 
Sometimes, they thought,
            the veil between the heavens and the earth wore a bit thin,
            particularly if you went up a mountain;
it’s one of the reasons people in the Bible
            often seem to go up to mountain tops to pray, or to meet with God.
They were, they believed, quite literally closer to God there.
 
Well, I’m pretty sure that none of us think
            that going up a mountain takes you literally closer to God.
Figuratively speaking, maybe
            – I absolutely do get the sense of transcendence
            that a magnificent view can offer.
 
But not literally.
            I’m not closer to God in an aeroplane than I am in church!
 
So I think we need to intentionally set aside the view
            of Our Father in Heaven as a distant God,
enthroned above the clouds
            and removed from our lives experiences of the world.
 
I think that a more helpful way of thinking of God as our Heavenly Father
            is to embrace this language as speaking to us
            of a God whose nature is to embrace all of the created order.
 
He is the God of the heavens and the earth,
            the God of nature, the God of all peoples,
            the God of all animals and all plants.
 
Our Father in Heaven is a vision of God
            whose love and care extends to the vastness of all that is;
and so to think of ourselves as children of this God
            is to name ourselves as those
            who are called to share with him in the task of universal love.
 
Rowan Williams has said that,
            ‘Very near the heart of Christian prayer
                        is getting over the idea that God is somewhere a very, very long way off,
                        so that we have to shout very loudly to be heard.
            On the contrary: God has decided to be an intimate friend
                        and he has decided to make us part of his family,
                        and we always pray on that basis.’[1]
 
So praying to Father God in heaven
            is not praying to the sky,
            hoping anxiously that the distant God can hear and will respond.
 
There is a profound paraphrase of the Lord’s Prayer
            developed by the African Fellowship of Union Church in Istanbul
            that captures this sense of the heavenly God
who desires to make himself available
            to all people everywhere who call upon his name.
 
I discovered it in a book on the Lord’s Prayer by Nijay Gupta,
            which has been very helpful to me in the preparation of this sermon.[2]
And with this I’m going to close:
 
Our Father Who Art in Heaven
You are in Istanbul, in our flats and hotels
            in Taksim and Beyoglu.
You are within us and in our homes.
You are in Africa, Europe,
            Australia, and the Americas.
In Yugoslavia and Russia.
You are with the hungry and dying children in Somalia.
Also in Liberia, Bosnia, Ethiopia,
            Sri Lanka, Kuwait, and Iraq.
Amen.


[1] Rowan Williams, Being Christian, p.66.
[2] Gupta, Nijay K. The Lord's Prayer. Smyth & Helwys Bible Commentary.  Macon, Georgia: Smyth & Helwys Publishing, Inc., 2017, p.51.

Wednesday, 18 January 2023

Beatitudes not Platitudes

A Sermon for 
Bloomsbury Central Baptist Church
22 January 2023, 11.00am

Mount of the Beatitudes, Galilee, 2022.

Micah 6.8 
Matthew 5.1-12  

In Monty Python's memorable take on the sermon on the mount,
            in the film 'The Life of Brian',
we get to see the response to Jesus' preaching
            by those stood at the back of the crowd,
                        barely able to hear the preacher on the hilltop in the distance,
            and misunderstanding his words to great comic effect. 
 
If you haven't seen it for a while,
            your homework this week is to watch it with my blessing.
 
The exchange includes everything
            from blessings on cheesemakers rather than peacemakers,
            to a discovery that it's the meek and not the Greek who shall inherit the earth,
                        which, as Mrs BigNose points out,
                        ‘is nice, isn't it, because the meek have a hell of a time’.
 
After a brief fight, the characters agree to head off to catch a stoning,
            and as they leave one of the Jewish revolutionaries is heard to mutter,
 
'Well, blessed is just about everyone
            with a vested interest in the status quo, as far as I can tell.'
 
To which his friend replies,
 
'Yeah. Well, what Jesus blatantly fails to appreciate
            is that it's the meek who are the problem.'
 
And I suspect it was ever thus,
            that those at the back of the crowd are ideologically, as well as geographically,
            distant from the voices at the centre.
 
Of course, what the Python team have intuitively picked up on
            in their version of the sermon on the mount,
is something that we see throughout Matthew's gospel:
            which is that some people, just a few,
                        get the truth of the message that Jesus is proclaiming;
            whereas others, the majority, are distant from him
                        and react badly to what they think they have heard.
 
This is almost certainly a reflection
            of the situation facing the community that Matthew was writing for,
                        some fifty years after the time of Jesus,
            where those in the small struggling congregations of Jesus-followers
                        were finding that most of those
                                    with whom they were trying to share the good news of their faith
                        were disinterested at best,
                                    and more often actively hostile to the challenge
                                    that the message of Jesus brought to their world and worldview.
 
And so Matthew gives his readers the sermon on the mount,
            with its memorable opening lines known now as the beatitudes,
to succinctly capture the force and energy of the preacher on the hilltop,
            whose voice continued to echo down the decades to their own time,
                        offering comfort and challenge in equal measure
                        to any who would dare to take the time to listen.
 
And it has ever been thus.
 
Radical Jesus-following has always been a minority sport;
            and I would suggest that those times where Christianity
                        has done a deal with power to get its message heard more widely
            have always resulted in a dilution of the message
                        away from its radical core.
 
In any form of Christendom,
            the beatitudes become a blessing, as Python put it,
                        on just about anyone with a vested interest in the status quo,
            and the heart of it all gets lost once again.
 
And the problem is as real for us today
            as it was for Matthew's community in the first century;
the beatitudes of Jesus are all too easily reduced to the platitudes of Jesus,
            as statements of revolutionary challenge
            become aphorisms of anodyne comfort.
 
Do you remember that the Bible reading at Donald Trump’s inauguration?
            saw Revd Samuel Rodriguez read the Beatitudes
                        from Jesus’ Sermon on the Mount.
 
It seemed to me to be almost beyond irony
            that the inaugural speech of Jesus’ ministry
should be set in such stark contrast
            with the inaugural presidential speech that followed it;
and yet I suspect for many of those listening,
            who saw in their new president a voice
                        for their pro-life, religiously conservative agendas,
            there was no irony at all.
 
The radical revolutionary message of Jesus
            is all too easily domesticated to powerful agendas,
and we need to take care to hear it afresh,
            lest we too miss the demands it makes on us and our own lives.
 
And what does this blessèd word ‘blessèd’ mean anyway?
 
I mean, it's all very well asserting that the meek and the mourning are blessed,
            but one has to wonder what earthly use is that to the person crippled by grief,
                        or too timid to speak up or out?
 
A few years ago, in an attempt to get to the heart of the beatitudes,
            I thought I'd have a go at re-rendering them.
 
The paraphrase I created is in the foyer,
            and you may well have read it.
 
But I’d like to read it again for you now.
 
I want to make it clear that I'm not, here,
            seeking to re-write the words of scripture;
rather I'm offering a reflection on the words of Jesus that Matthew gives us,
            to help us engage with them in fresh ways.
 
Blessèd are those who refuse the lie that one life is worth more than any other,
for theirs is the future of humanity.
 
Blessèd are those who have stared long into the abyss,
for theirs is honesty beyond grief.
 
Blessèd are those who resist retaliation,
for the earth will never be won by force.
 
Blessèd are those who would rather die for truth than live with compromise,
for the truth will outlive all lies.
 
Blessèd are those who forgive the unforgivable,
for they have seen the darkness of their own souls.
 
Blessèd are those who know themselves truly,
for they have seen themselves as God sees them.
 
Blessèd are those who are provocatively nonviolent,
for they are following the path of the son of God.
 
Blessèd are those who choose to receive violence but not to give it,
for the future is born out of such choices.
 
Blessèd are you when you stand up for truth
and hell itself decides to try and destroy you.
You're not the first and you won't be the last.
 
I'm telling you now, nothing makes any sense unless you learn see it differently,
and then choose to live that alternative into being.
 
So firstly, I wonder, what does it mean to be blessed?
            It’s not a word we use a lot, really, is it; at least not in its archaic form
                        of two syllables with an accent over the second ‘e’ – bless-èd
 
It has resonances of Shakespeare and the King James Bible;
            and it’s modern pronunciation of ‘blest’
            has lost much of its depth of meaning in contemporary usage,
                        often reduced to a vague assertion of feeling fortunate.
            As in, ‘I’m blest to have you has a friend’.
 
It’s further popular rendering as just ‘bless’ has robbed it of almost all meaning,
            becoming little more than a patronising response to someone who has tried,
                        but failed, to achieve anything worthwhile.
            As in, ‘Look at that drawing she’s done, Bless!’
 
            Ugh.
 
Anyway, I wonder if we can find a way to bring it back to relevance,
            to rediscover the force of what Jesus was doing by proclaiming a blessing
            on the meek, the mournful, and the merciful.
 
In the Jewish religious context of the first century,
            one of the great theological debates
            was that of who was worthy to receive the blessing of God?
 
The Jews held that they were God’s chosen people,
            called from among the nations,
            and blessed by God with the gift of a ‘special relationship’ with him.
 
But within this general calling and blessing, there was a further level of disparity
            between those who were regarded as blessed, and those who were not;
            and there was much discussion as to what God’s blessing looked like.
 
If you think that the prosperity gospel of health and wealth is a new phenomenon,
                        and unique to Christianity,
            then think again, because the ancient Jews got there first.
 
There was a school of thought that held that if you were obedient to the covenant,
            you would experience the blessings of God as a reward for your faithfulness.
These blessings might be financial,
            or related to health, or to family life, such as having lots of children.
 
It’s not quite, ‘touch the screen, and you’re gonna be healed’,
            but it comes from a similar place,
in terms of seeing God’s blessings
            as linked to human obedience and sacrifice.
 
Jesus wasn’t the first to challenge this idea,
            and, for example, the book of Job is an extended piece of theological reflection
                        on why bad things happen to good people,
            questioning where God is in the face of human suffering.
 
Again, these are not new questions…
 
The prophet Micah, who we heard from in our first reading this morning,
            also questioned the nature of the sacrifice that God might require,
            in order for his blessings to be dispensed.
He asked,
 
Shall I come before him with burnt offerings? 
Will the LORD be pleased with thousands of rams,
            with ten thousands of rivers of oil?
Shall I give my firstborn for my transgression,
            the fruit of my body for the sin of my soul?"
 
And the answer that he hears to this question is radical:
 
He has told you, O mortal, what is good;
and what does the LORD require of you
            but to do justice,
            and to love kindness,
            and to walk humbly with your God?
 
It is in this tradition of Micah and Job,
            that Jesus started proclaiming blessings
            on those whom others would despise.
 
Many voices told people that their vulnerability was a curse;
            Jesus, however, proclaimed it as a blessing.
 
And so…
 
Blessed are those who refuse the lie that one life is worth more than any other,
            for theirs is the future of humanity.
 
This really is the great lie,
            it is the great deceit of Satan.
Because the moment any one of us starts to believe
            that one life is more precious to God than any other,
then the door is opened for all manner of evil to take root and flourish.
 
Against this, the radical message that Jesus proclaimed
            was that the kingdom of heaven
            belongs to those with a poverty of spirit;
to those with an un-inflated view of their own self-importance;
            to those who know that any value they have in life comes from God,
            and not from any achievement or status they may hold.
 
But so many of the messages of our society
            fly in the face of true poverty of spirit.
 
From the advertisers’ mantra that ‘you’re worth it’
            to fevered assertions of America, or indeed any nation, First,
and the nationalistic protectionism that comes
            from a mindset of ‘my country right or wrong’.
 
Friends, we need to recover a Godly sense of our own value,
            and to discover in that, the value of those others
            whom we could otherwise so easily diminish.
 
And so the challenge continues:
 
Blessed are those who have stared long into the abyss,
            for theirs is honesty beyond grief.
 
Bereavement can sap all hope, but there is hope here:
            that those who have learned to live with great loss
                        may discover through their grief the brutal honesty of human mortality,
            in ways that others will never grasp.
 
The comfort for those who mourn is not won easily, or quickly;
            and it comes through pain and tears.
 
But in a world which despises weakness,
            and which denies the transience of life,
the ability to out-stare death is a blessing known only to some;
            and yet is a great gift that they bring to humanity.
 
We each of us, in our own way, one day,
            will look death in the face,
and on that day we will need those who have seen that face before,
            and learned to live with its reality.
 
And so the challenge continues:
 
Blessed are those who resist retaliation,
            for the earth will never be won by force.
 
We can build walls and missiles to our heart’s content,
            securing our borders with Mutually Assured Destruction,
            and ever more stringent restrictions on movement.
 
We can make our pacts and alliances,
            and stand in solidarity with countries of like-mind.
We can love NATO or hate it.
 
But, says Jesus, the earth does not belong to those with guns, or missiles,
            it belongs to the meek;
it belongs to those who resist retaliation,
            to those who will commit themselves
                        to alternatives to the spiralling violence
                        that generates strike after counter-strike.
 
The future belongs to those who will build bridges and not walls,
            to those who turn swords into ploughshares
            and guns into statues.
 
We will need creativity and courage
            if we are to stand against the prevailing mind-set of retaliation.
But it is a fight that is worth the effort,
            because all other paths lead to death.
 
And so the challenge continues:
 
Blessed are those who would rather die for truth than live with compromise,
            for the truth will outlive all lies.
 
We live in a world of fake news,
            and alternative facts.
We live in a post-truth world,
            where the lie wins the argument if it’s said loud enough and often enough.
 
We are constantly invited and cajoled to abandon truth,
            and follow the herd.
 
And yet where in this is righteousness,
            where in this is truth?
 
The answer, to quote the X files, is that the truth is out there,
            we just need to seek it out, and then speak it out.
 
And this is not easy – it is hard, thirsty work, seeking the springs of righteousness,
            but we must not abandon the quest,
            and we must resist compromise.
 
And so the challenge continues:
 
Blessed are those who forgive the unforgivable,
            for they have seen the darkness of their own souls.
 
Many years ago I heard the late Jill Saward speak at Greenbelt,
            you may remember her, she was a victim of the Ealing vicarage rape attack.
And the courage with which she faced the crime that had been done to her,
            and her willingness to speak language of forgiveness as a path to wholeness,
had a profound effect on me.
 
And in my pastoral work I speak sometimes
            with those who have been greatly wronged,
            victims of abuse of all kinds,
and I have never found it appropriate to tell anyone
            that they must forgive their abuser.
 
But when someone comes to the conclusion
            that the path from victimhood
            lies through the dark valley of forgiveness,
and when they realise that despite the wrong done to them
            they share common humanity with those who do wrong to others,
something profound can shift,
            and a moment of blessing can emerge.
 
But when we think of this on a global scale,
            when we bring to mind the terrorist atrocities of all the years,
            from Isis to the IRA and beyond,
and when we see the historical scars of un-forgiveness
            written across whole societies and nations,
we can begin to see why mercy is a blessing that cuts both ways.
 
And so the challenge continues:
 
Blessed are those who know themselves truly,
            for they have seen themselves as God sees them.
 
Socrates famously said
            that ‘an unexamined life is not worth living’.
 
And I find myself wondering more and more
            whether the journey of discipleship in Christ
            is primarily a journey into the love of God,
which takes shape in our lives
            as we learn to see ourselves not as we want to be seen,
                        and not as others see us,
            but as God sees us.
 
The challenge here, is that God sees us with the unflinching gaze of love,
            and we so resist the idea of being loved.
 
We live with such suppressed guilt, such internalised self-hatred,
            that the idea of being loved, of being truly forgiven and accepted,
            is as alien to us as our long lost childhoods.
 
And yet, and yet God loves us,
            and forgives us,
                        and when we learn to see ourselves as God sees us,
                        we discover purity in place of pain,
            and we find the face of God in the midst of our complex existence.
 
And so the challenge continues:
 
Blessed are those who are provocatively nonviolent,
            for they are following the path of the son of God.
 
The path of peacemaking is not supposed to be straightforward.
            It’s never just a passive pacifism that lays down and dies
                        when confronted with violent opposition.
 
Christ-like nonviolence is something far more creative,
            something far more subversive.
 
Jim Gordon, former principal of the Scottish Baptist College,
            wrote that the
 
Followers of the crucified Lord have a long tradition of resistance
            through revolutionary love, bridge-building hope,
            perseverance in peace, and joy in trumping injustice.[1]
 
And those of us who are watching with concern
            as violence escalates on the international stage,
will need to be provocatively nonviolent
            if we are to speak out a different, more Christ-like narrative,
            for people to learn to live by.
 
And so the challenge continues:
 
Blessed are those who choose to receive violence but not to give it,
            for the future is born out of such choices.
 
It is a truth that there are many places in the world
            where the followers of Jesus face persecution
            because they will not compromise on what they know to be right.
 
The temptation to turn an experience of persecution into a quest for vengeance
            is ever before those who have been wronged,
and those who make the choice to receive, but not to give out,
            find themselves walking the path of the cross,
            and setting a new direction for those who follow.
 
And so the challenge continues:
 
Blessed are you when you stand up for truth
            and hell itself decides to try and destroy you.
You're not the first and you won't be the last.
 
I think that too often Christians have their Earth-Heaven trajectory
            the wrong way around.
 
The dawning of the kingdom of heaven
            is not about us going to heaven,
            it’s about heaven coming to us.
 
Jesus taught his disciples to pray,
            ‘your kingdom come on earth, as it is in heaven.’
 
Do you get it?
            Can you see it?
 
Most can’t, and won’t,
            and that’s the truth of it.
 
But those of us who can,
            those of us who are close enough to the one at the centre
            to hear his voice and heed his words;
we get it, we get the kingdom,
            and we must then live that kingdom into being.
We must live as if it were true,
            until it is true.
 
I'm telling you now, nothing makes any sense unless you learn see it differently,
            and then choose to live that alternative into being.