Bloomsbury
Central Baptist Church
12th
January 2014, 11.00am
Matthew
3.13 - 17 Then Jesus came from Galilee to John at the
Jordan, to be baptized by him. 14
John would have prevented him, saying, "I need to be baptized by you, and
do you come to me?" 15
But Jesus answered him, "Let it be so now; for it is proper for us in this
way to fulfill all righteousness." Then he consented. 16 And when Jesus had been
baptized, just as he came up from the water, suddenly the heavens were opened
to him and he saw the Spirit of God descending like a dove and alighting on
him. 17 And a voice from
heaven said, "This is my Son, the Beloved, with whom I am well
pleased."
Isaiah
42.1-9 Here is my servant, whom I uphold, my chosen,
in whom my soul delights; I have put my spirit upon him; he will bring forth
justice to the nations. 2 He
will not cry or lift up his voice, or make it heard in the street; 3 a bruised reed he will not
break, and a dimly burning wick he will not quench; he will faithfully bring
forth justice. 4 He will not
grow faint or be crushed until he has established justice in the earth; and the
coastlands wait for his teaching. 5
Thus says God, the LORD, who created the heavens and stretched them out, who
spread out the earth and what comes from it, who gives breath to the people
upon it and spirit to those who walk in it:
6 I am the LORD, I have called you in righteousness, I have
taken you by the hand and kept you; I have given you as a covenant to the
people, a light to the nations, 7
to open the eyes that are blind, to bring out the prisoners from the dungeon,
from the prison those who sit in darkness.
8 I am the LORD, that is my name; my glory I give to no
other, nor my praise to idols. 9
See, the former things have come to pass, and new things I now declare; before
they spring forth, I tell you of them.
At the heart of today’s reading
from Matthew’s gospel
is something of a mystery,
and
it’s a mystery that has puzzled people
from John the Baptist himself,
to the biblical scholars of our own
time.
Now,
I’m not proposing that we’ll fully resolve this mystery this morning,
but spending a few moments with it
might
help us find a way
into one of the more
puzzling scenarios of the gospels.
The
mystery is this:
Why does Jesus come to John for
baptism?
The
story appears in all three of the synoptic gospels,
and is alluded to in John’s gospel,
so
in as much as we know anything about Jesus and John,
we know the story of Jesus
being baptized by John in the river
Jordan.
But
the question is, why?
Why did Jesus do this?
What was Jesus thinking when he came
to John for baptism?
Was
it a baptism of repentance for sins committed?
If it was, then this is somewhat out
of step
with the dominant
Christian teaching
that Jesus was sinless
and had no need of repentance?
Was
it a baptism of solidarity with sinners,
with Jesus simply standing alongside
those who did need to repent?
Possibly,
although it’s not clear why baptism by John is necessary for this,
unless it is simply to underline
what has already happened at the
incarnation.
If this
is a question that puzzles modern readers,
we can take some comfort from the
fact
that it also seemed to puzzle John
himself.
We’re
told that John initially tried to prevent Jesus from being baptised,
asking instead that Jesus should
baptise him.
But
Jesus argued back by saying, somewhat enigmatically,
‘Let it be so for now,
for it is proper for us in this way
to fulfil all righteousness.’ (v.15)
And
here we find our first clue,
as we begin to grapple with the
mystery of Jesus’ baptism.
Jesus
is baptised by John to ‘fulfil all righteousness’.
We might
normally think of ‘righteousness’ as one of Paul’s great themes,
with his letters, particularly
Romans,
shot full of language about
justification and righteousness.
But
it’s also a concept that crops up again and again in Matthew’s gospel,
particularly in terms of
the ‘fulfilment of righteousness’,
and we’ll find ourselves coming back
to this over the coming year
as
our Sunday readings take us through Matthew.
His
gospel is often described as the most ‘Jewish’ of the gospels,
and his repeated use of the term
‘righteousness’
is one of the things that indicates
his particularly Jewish concern.
‘Righteousness’
as a theological concept
finds its origins in the
Hebrew scriptures,
where it’s used to express
conformity to God’s will
in all areas of life:
from law and government,
to covenant
loyalty and ethical integrity.
The
Jewish idea of ‘righteousness’ was that
when humans conformed to God’s will,
rather than to any other
claim on their life,
they were considered
just or righteous.
To
put it another way, the Jewish insight was that
because God is righteous,
so his people are to be righteous in
their behaviour.
Or,
to put it yet another way,
‘Righteousness’ was considered a
visible sign
in the life of God’s
people,
confirming their status as members
of God’s covenant community.
How
did you know whether you were part of God’s people?
You knew because of righteousness.
It was a sign of the covenant
So
when people departed from righteous living,
when they worshipped other gods,
or failed to keep the commands of
the Lord,
they
were considered to be breaking the covenant,
and the ancient Jewish prophets,
such as Elijah,
would call them to repentance,
to a turning back to
righteousness,
and to a rediscovery of life lived
in covenant relationship
with the God of
righteousness.
And
this calling of people to repentance,
this challenging of them to submit
themselves to God’s will,
and to live righteous lives,
was
the key message of John the Baptist,
sometimes described as the new
Elijah,
who
appeared in the wilderness
baptising people with a baptism of
repentance.
From
John the Baptist’s perspective,
the society of his day had departed
from the covenant;
it had lost its focus on
righteousness,
and needed to turn, to repent, and
to start living differently.
So
the baptism of John was a rallying call
for all those who wanted to join him
in his rejection of
society,
it was a baptism of turning away,
a
baptism of repudiation of the dominant values
of his society and
religion.
It
was a baptism that marked a commitment
to live life in a very different way
from that which the world was
demanding.
In
the midst of all the pressures to conform,
be they ideological pressures,
theological pressures,
or
sociological pressures,
John
invited people to turn away from an unrighteous society
and to turn towards a new way of
living.
He
called them to enter into the life of a new kingdom,
where God was once again the focus
of existence,
and
behaviour was determined by obedience to God,
not conformity to the status quo.
By
this reading,
John’s baptism was a radical and
non-conformist baptism.
It
was an outward sign of an inward commitment
to rejection of an unrighteous
society,
and
a turning towards an alternative,
God-focussed, way of being.
So,
when Jesus came to be baptised by John,
‘to fulfil all righteousness’,
he
was aligning himself with the non-conformist and radical nature
of John’s challenge to first century
Jewish society.
It
wasn’t a baptism for the forgiveness of his personal sins,
rather, it was an act of public
repudiation of conformity.
It
was a rejection of the compromises
by which his inherited religious
tradition
had entered into its uneasy alliance
with the powers that be,
and
it was an act of commitment to the recovery
of the true meaning of the covenant
as the in-breaking of God’s justice
and righteousness on the earth.
The
challenge which John brought to the world
of first-century, second Temple
Judaism,
is
a challenge that echoes down the millennia to us as well.
It
is a relevant challenge to us, because humans,
be they first or twenty-first
century humans,
have
a tendency to compromise,
a tendency to set aside
righteousness,
and
a tendency to then justify that compromise
as necessary, pragmatic, or
expedient.
‘It’s
just the way the world is’, we tell ourselves.
‘We can’t change it, so we might as
well join it’, we say.
We
conform, and then we try to justify our conformity,
as we try to justify ourselves,
by
making the same move in our own time
that John challenged in the first
century
with his baptism of repentance.
The
collusion of the Christian church with the powers that be,
from the time of Constantine
onwards,
has
reinvented within the church of Christ,
the same pattern of compromise
that
led John into the wilderness to take his stand.
The
tradition of Christendom,
of the ‘Christian country’
is
the same attempt to fuse faith and fatherland
that led to the post-exilic Jewish
compromise of the first century.
And
the baptism of Jesus at the hands of John
was an expression of his commitment
to a radical,
non-conformist alternative.
Jesus’
baptism was him consciously and publicly aligning himself
with the radical revolution of the
Kingdom of God,
where compromise is
rejected,
and conformity
confounded.
Now,
this is a vision of baptism
that I can start to get quite
excited about!
You
may have noticed that the building where we’re currently worshipping,
rejoices under the name of
Bloomsbury Central Baptist Church.
The
history of this fellowship has been told and re-told
by far greater historians than I, so
I won’t rehearse it again now.
But
I do want us to pay attention for a moment
to the fact that we are a Baptist church.
We’re
a church that baptises.
We invite people into the waters of
baptism,
and we immerse them on expression of
repentance
and declaration of
faith.
We
do, pretty much, what John did.
And many of us have been through
that experience ourselves,
following the example
and command of Jesus Christ.
And
the origin of this practice,
at least in the way that leads to
the Baptist churches of the current era,
was
for baptism to be seen as an act of non-conformity.
The
early Baptists of the seventeenth century were,
like their earlier continental
cousins the Anabaptists,
uneasy
about the alliances and collusions
that had grown up between church and
state.
They
were unhappy with a situation that required all children to be baptised
as an expression of their joint
membership of church and nation.
The
rejection of infant-baptism,
and the rediscovery of
believer-baptism,
was
born not just out of theological conviction,
but also from radical political conviction.
We
have a baptism coming up here at Bloomsbury in a couple of weeks,
when Graham will be making his
journey
through the waters.
It
will be a joyous, and challenging occasion,
but what we don’t expect is that it
will put his life in danger.
Yet
this was once the case here in London,
and it remains the case in other
parts of the world,
as some of those who are part of our
fellowship here can testify.
In
many ways we have lost the political significance of baptism,
and yet Jesus’ baptism at the hands
of John
points to a profoundly and radically
politicised act.
Now
I’m sure none of us yearns for a return to persecution,
In fact, the commitment to religious
liberty for all
is as much a core part
of our Baptist history
as the non-conformist
act of baptism itself.
But
nonetheless, we should not lose sight of the radical and political nature
of baptising someone in repentance
and into righteousness.
Baptism
is more than a symbol
of our personal forgiveness
and of our identification with
Christ in his death and resurrection.
It
is also a sign of our entry
into a radical, revolutionary, and
counter-cultural lifestyle
that rejects the status
quo of conformity
and yearns, longs and lives for a
world transformed,
a world re-imagined, a
world reconfigured.
Baptism
is the initiatory act
of the convicted revolutionaries
of the in-breaking kingdom of God
It
is a rejection of conformist religion,
it is a rejection of the notion of
the Christian country,
and
it is something people take upon themselves
to mark their membership of and
entering into
a radical new way of
living.
And
so we come to our second mystery in today’s reading…
And the second mystery is this:
Why a dove?
Jesus
has gone to John, had his argument, and been baptised,
and then something very strange,
something very apocalyptic, happens.
The
heavens open, and the Spirit of God
is seen descending on Jesus like a
dove,
and alighting on him.
And
I find myself wondering, why a dove?
But
then something even more strange happens,
and a voice is heard speaking from
heaven,
And
the divine voice quotes the prophet Isaiah,
‘This is my Son, the beloved, with
whom I am well pleased’.
All
very strange, when you stop to think about it.
And all very symbolic.
So let’s
start with the voice,
and then come back to the dove.
The
quote from Isaiah is from chapter 42,
which we had as our Old Testament
reading.
And
as is often the case with those places
where the New Testament quotes the
old,
the
quote is just the first verse,
but it implies the whole of the
passage that follows.
In
this case, the Old Testament passage that is being referenced
is the first of the four
‘servant songs’ of Isaiah,
where the prophet writes of a
servant
who will bring about a
new world
through suffering,
death, and restoration to new life.
In
the context of Isaiah’s original community,
the suffering servant was Israel
itself,
it was Israel personified.
Isaiah
was writing to the exiled Jews in Babylon,
offering them a perspective on their
present suffering,
and a hope for future
restoration,
by personifying the nation of Israel
as a servant,
whose suffering and
restoration
would bring about a new
world of justice and righteousness.
In
the Christian tradition,
and we see it here in the words
spoken from Heaven at Jesus’ baptism,
this
vision of Israel personified, of Israel the servant,
of Israel as the one who
suffers and is restored,
came to be seen as finding
fulfilment in the person of Jesus.
It
is Jesus who takes on the role previously held by Israel,
and he does so by divine command.
He
becomes Israel, he becomes the servant who suffers,
and he does so in order to bring
about
the new world of justice
and righteousness,
he does so in order to inaugurate
the Kingdom of God.
And
so back to the dove.
I(n the Jewish tradition,
the
dove was used as a symbol for Israel,
and the descent of the Spirit as a
dove on Jesus
provides a further clue
that the one on whom the dove
alights
should be understood
as a personification of
the nation of Israel.
It
is through Jesus that the covenant will be fulfilled.
It is through the suffering and
resurrection of Jesus
that Israel will be
restored
and the righteousness of God made
known throughout the earth.
And
so the voice says to Jesus,
to the one who is to become the
servant,
to the one who is to suffer and die
before restoration can come,
‘This
is my Son, the Beloved, with whom I am well pleased’
And
so the servant song from Isaiah is heard over the waters of the Jordan,
as the prophetic insight of the
exiled prophet in Babylon
is proclaimed fulfilled in the life
of Jesus of Nazareth.
Here
is my servant, whom I uphold,
my chosen, in whom my soul delights;
I
have put my spirit upon him;
he will bring forth justice to the nations.
2 He will not cry or lift up
his voice,
or make it heard in the street;
3 a bruised reed he will not
break,
and a dimly burning wick he will not
quench;
he will faithfully bring forth justice.
4 He will not grow faint or
be crushed
until he has established justice in the earth.
The
kingdom is coming…
and it’s a kingdom of righteousness
and justice.
And
it’s coming through Christ,
the servant who is also the son of
God.
The
emperors of Rome may have claimed the term ‘son of God’ for themselves
to legitimate their own rule over
the world,
but
the voice from heaven, the voice of God
proclaims Jesus, and Jesus alone,
as the legitimate son of God.
The
earth is the Lord’s and Jesus is his son,
and all other powers and
principalities are merely false pretenders.
Their
claims to divine sonship are illegitimate attempts
to assume a throne and a kingdom
that does not belong to them.
And
so we are back to the political ramifications
of the baptism of Jesus in the
wilderness.
Just
as the people of Israel made their exodus from the empire of Egypt
through the wilderness to promised
land;
just
as the prophet of the exiles
proclaimed the hope of a second
exile from Babylon;
so
Christ, in whom Israel and covenant are fulfilled,
initiates the third and final exodus
from all the corrupt and
evil empires of the world
as people follow Jesus through the
waters of baptism
into the new world of justice
and righteousness
that is the kingdom of
God
Jesus not only identifies
himself with John’s radical rejection of conformity,
but he is proclaimed the
personification of Israel,
and commissioned as the
rightful holder
of all power in heaven
and on earth.
But,
and here is the radical theological insight:
he holds that power as a servant,
not as an emperor.
This
is where politics and theology collide.
Jesus,
the son of God, saves the world not through conquest,
but through suffering.
He
brings new life through death,
and hope into the darkness.
Because
his kingdom is a kingdom of justice and righteousness,
and it is breaking in upon the earth
as others catch the vision, and join
the movement.
And
so Jesus came from Galilee to John at the Jordan,
to be baptised by him.
And
he calls us to follow his example,
and to join him in his radical and
non-conformist vision
for the transformation of the world.
No comments:
Post a comment