Sunday, 14 December 2025

The Living Water of God's Abundant Welcome

A Sermon for Bloomsbury Central Baptist Church
Advent 3 - 14 December 2025

Isaiah 55.1-13
John 4.13-14

Good morning. On this Third Sunday of Advent
            we gather in a city facing tension, division, and fear.

Saturday’s march in London made claims to the Christian story
            in ways that sought to speak for British identity and national heritage,
            and to create a certain version of “our country”.

But for countless people: our neighbours, our friends,
            asylum‑seekers, migrants,
            Jewish people, Muslims, people of colour, and many more,
the echoes of fear still linger this morning.

I recognise that some who get swept up in this rhetoric
            are anxious about economic insecurity, social fragmentation, and rapid change.
But the kind of rhetoric that marched in our streets yesterday
            leaves others of us with a range of emotions from despair to grief.

And so today our Advent waiting does not feel distant or abstract.
            It feels urgent.

The invitation of the prophet remains as pressing and as beautiful now as then.
            Isaiah says: “Come, all you who are thirsty, come to the waters.”

And in John’s Gospel, Jesus echoes that promise:
            “If anyone drinks of the water that I will give, they will never be thirsty.”

These words of universal invitation come to us today not as escapist spirituality,
            but as living hope, as challenge,
            as a call to courage, compassion, justice and welcome.

This sermon is offered because I believe our faith summons us
            to a hope bigger than fear,
a hope rooted in God’s abundance, God’s word made flesh,
            and God’s transforming presence in the world.

The church should not take its cues from extremist movements,
            our starting point is always the revelation of God in Jesus Christ,
            made known to us through the scriptures by the Spirit.
Our response should always be rooted in God’s vision of shalom.

And so I want to begin by returning to the message of the prophet,
            “Come, all you who are thirsty, come to the waters.”

This invitation is radically inclusive.
            There is no small print. No qualifications. No membership card.
            The only admission requirement to God’s kingdom is thirst.

When Isaiah spoke those words,
            his hearers were people shaped by exile, loss,
            economic hardship, and displacement.

Scarcity was the condition of their lives.
            Houses destroyed. Dreams shattered.
            The world rearranged around them.

Perhaps you know something of that pain today.
            Perhaps you feel it in your own bones, or you see it in the lives of others;
friends living precariously, people longing for welcome,
            those for whom “belonging” feels like a distant promise.

The dominant voices around us,
            in politics, on social media, through banners or slogans,
            often demand that we protect, exclude, and guard what is “ours”.

That logic says: we have limited resources.
            We must decide who belongs and who does not.
            We must guard identity, defend heritage, seal borders.

That logic does not seek to heal. It seeks to preserve.

But the word of Isaiah says something entirely different.
            It declares abundance.
Water for the thirsty. Bread for the hungry.
            Welcome for those who have no money, no status, no place at the table.

This is not sentimentality.
            This is counter-imperial theology.
            It is a subversive logic that refuses scarcity as the final word.

And then Isaiah adds another weighty claim.
            God’s word, he says, like rain and snow, does not return empty.
It accomplishes the purpose for which it was sent.
            When God speaks, something happens.
            Life blossoms. Deserts bloom. Drought ends.

That is a powerful claim in ordinary times.
            But it becomes urgent when our world is torn
            by narratives of fear, hostility, and exclusion.

When hateful slogans are chanted in the streets
            and religious symbols are misused to justify prejudice,
            we must resist the temptation to stay silent.

Because God’s word is not quiet by default,
            it moves. It challenges. It renews.

In the Gospel of John we encounter Jesus standing at a well.
            An ordinary place. Not a temple courtyard. Not a hall of power.
            Just a dusty well where people come for water.

And Jesus speaks to a foreign woman there, and offers her living water.
            Water that does not run dry.
            Water that satisfies her deepest thirst.

This living water that Jesus speaks of is not reserved for insiders,
            for those with certificates of belonging.

It flows for everyone. For those seen and unseen.
            For those welcome, and those pushed to the margins.
            For those acclaimed by society, and those disregarded.

This week we have seen Christian identity
            claimed by those who marched under banners of exclusion.
            Some worshipping twisted slogans, and appeals to nationalism.

But the Gospel reminds us that the water Jesus offers flows to all humanity,
            regardless of passport, skin colour, language, religion, or status.

If we follow Christ, we cannot remain silent.
            If we follow the One who offers living water, we must speak truth.
We must act. We must welcome.

Isaiah’s invitation is not only to drink and be satisfied;
            it is a summons to discern how we live in the world.

The prophet speaks to people who have experienced exile, oppression,
            and the arbitrary power of rulers.

This is precisely the world that can look familiar to us
            in the wake of marches, slogans, and fear-driven politics.

The thirst Isaiah calls us to acknowledge
            is not only our personal longing for God’s comfort;
                        it is the thirst of the city itself,
            the thirst for justice, for honesty, for dignity, and for mercy.

In a society where fear is leveraged to divide communities,
            where identity is weaponised against neighbours,
            and where power seeks to intimidate the vulnerable,
God’s living water calls us to resist all forms of spiritual and social dehydration.

Jesus offered this living water at the well of Samaria,
            as he reached across boundaries of gender, ethnicity, and status.
He spoke to a woman whom society had marginalised
            and whose community would have preferred she remain invisible.

He did not ask her to qualify for grace, to prove her worthiness,
            or to demonstrate allegiance to the powerful.

He simply invited her to drink, to engage,
            to experience the transformation of God’s presence in her life.

In the same way, the church is called to practice inclusion that is active, not passive.
            To see, hear, and welcome
            those whom others seek to silence, exclude, or demean.

This active welcome is not sentimental.

It is inherently political because it challenges the logic of exclusion and scarcity.
            In a world where fear drives narratives
                        about “our city,” “our people,” and “our country,”
            the Christian response is to insist that living water is for all.

That God’s provision does not run out.
            That grace, hospitality, and solidarity are abundant,
            not limited to the privileged or the powerful.

When we make space for those whom society would push to the margins,
            we enact the kingdom’s logic in tangible ways.

We resist the co-option of religion for fear,
            and we witness that love and justice
            are stronger than slogans or intimidation.

We are called to drink deeply ourselves, yes,
            but also to become conduits of that water for others.

To stand with those who feel threatened, marginalised, or afraid.
            To speak truth when the powerful misrepresent faith to justify exclusion.

To intervene in subtle and overt ways when injustice manifests,
            whether through casual prejudice, hostile policies,
            or public demonstrations that sow fear.

The living water Jesus offers transforms us
            so that we become bearers of hope, dignity, and welcome.

It allows us to see beyond fear and scarcity,
            to recognise the God-given worth of every person,
            and to act courageously in ways that promote peace and justice.

In this season of Advent, when we await the Christ-child,
            the challenge is clear: to align our thirst with God’s purpose.

To let our longing for justice, for healing, and for reconciliation
            shape how we move through the city,
            how we engage with our neighbours,
            and how we make room at the table for the stranger,
                        the outsider, and the oppressed.

God’s invitation is radical, countercultural, and transformative.
            It demands that we confront fear, reject the idolatry of exclusion,
            and participate actively in God’s mission of abundant life for all.

And so we come to the simplicity, and the challenge, of the Nativity.

We sometimes sanitise this story.
            We place it in a cosy manger,
            with warm lamps, sweet music, and sentimental angels.

But that sanitised version is not the Bible’s version.

The real story is raw.
            The real story involves displacement.

A pregnant mother and a fiancé forced to travel
            because the empire demanded a census and control.

We know the story:
            Mary likely gave birth in the lower room of a family home,
            among extended family, with women providing support,
            because the guest room was already full.

It’s a story of hospitality and solidarity within the community,
            not rejection by it.

A story of vulnerability, of human fragility.
            and ordinary people giving care to those who are vulnerable
            in the face of powerful forces set to do them harm.

And in that story the powerful find no place.
            The empire claims control.
            The census demands numbers.
            The rulers tax and count.

But the Word becomes flesh not in a palace,
            not in a hall of power,
but in a borrowed room in a little town,
            among people whose names never make the headlines.

Oppression comes from empire, with its census, displacement,
            fear, militarised power, and Herod’s violence.

But solidarity comes from ordinary people making space in cramped conditions,
            offering us a powerful counter-image to the hostile rhetoric in public life today.

The little child of God belongs to the poor,
            to the refugees, the outsiders, the marginalised.

The Christ child belongs to every womb that trembles with uncertainty,
            to every heart that wonders if they belong,
            to every human being whose dignity has been questioned.

So when we hear the Christmas story this year,
            in the days after a march claiming to recover “our heritage” and “our identity”,
            let us remember who that baby was, and who that baby still is.

Not the symbol of empire.
            Not the flag of a nation.
            Not the banner of exclusion.

But the sign of God’s belonging and God’s welcome.
            The sign that God chooses the vulnerable, the displaced,
            the stranger, and the outsider.
The sign that no human border, no human slogan,
            no human barricade can contain the love God pours out.

This is the theology of the manger.
            This is Advent hope.

And if this is true, then our call is to live it.
            Not only on Sundays.
            Not only in sermons or hymns.
But in everyday life. In our streets. In our workplaces.
            In our neighbourhoods. In our city.

We are called to radical hospitality.
            To offer water and welcome to those who thirst.
To offer dignity to those who have been denied it.
            To stand with those who feel threatened, marginalised, and afraid.
To make our church a sanctuary not just in name, but in practice.

This Advent, as every Advent,
            Christ’s call to abundant welcome becomes a political act.

Christ comes to our world as we open our doors, our hearts, and our resources.
            As we challenge prejudice.
            As we stand beside those the world would rather ignore.
            As we speak truth in public spaces.

When we offer living water,
            we are claiming that God’s resources are not limited.

That love, justice, dignity, belonging
            are not scarcity goods to be rationed.
            They are abundant gifts. Gifts poured out for all.

We might be a small congregation.
            We might have limited resources.
But we are part of the church universal, the household of God,
            where the feast is open, where the table is large,
            and where there is a place for everyone.

We do not need to hoard. We do not need to fence.
            We do not need to fear the outsider.
We only need to remember that the Word became flesh among the vulnerable.
            That God’s welcome is wider than any ethnic identity,
            any nationality, any passport.

So this Advent, I invite you to imagine differently.

To imagine a London transformed,
            not a closed city, not a city of fear, suspicion and division.

But a city of living abundant water,
            a city of welcome, a city of belonging.

A city where the table is open,
            where strangers become neighbours,
                        where fear is met with courage,
            where justice meets mercy,
                        and where love becomes action.

Imagine a city shaped not by slogans of identity
            but by hospitality, solidarity, compassion,
            justice, and dignity for every person.

This Sunday, as we gather for worship, liturgy, song, and prayer,
            and as we celebrate the coming of Jesus,
we affirm that God’s invitation still stands:
            “Come, all you who are thirsty.”

We do not wait passively.
            We come. We listen.
            We drink. We act. We welcome.

Because the living water Christ offers is not for some.
            It is for all.

Because God’s word will not return empty.

Because the manger was never meant for empires.
            It was meant for the world.

May we, this congregation, this city, this people, live into that promise.

Amen.

Friday, 12 December 2025

Covenant, Belonging, and the Future of Baptist Identity

Among Baptists in recent decades there has been a renewed interest in the language of covenant as a way of describing how we belong together. The impulse is understandable. Covenant is a deeply scriptural category, and it carries a sense of relationship, commitment and mutual responsibility that resonates with our congregational instincts. Yet I find myself increasingly unsure that covenant provides the most helpful framework for describing what binds us together across our Union, particularly when the conversation shifts from churches to ministers, and from relationships to doctrinal boundaries.

My concerns are not with covenant in Scripture, but with how covenant functions when imported into denominational or ministerial life. The biblical covenants reveal a God who remains faithful even when human beings fail. They reveal a relationship that begins in grace rather than contract. The origin point is always divine initiative, rooted in a commitment that is neither conditional nor easily dissolved. When covenant is used in Baptist discourse without that frame of reference, it can subtly shift into something rather different. Instead of naming a relationship of grace, it can begin to police the boundaries of compliance. Instead of inviting us to bear with one another in faithfulness, it can become a mechanism for identifying transgression.

This is why I have grown uneasy with suggestions that particular convictions or pastoral decisions might be said to break covenant between ministers. When covenant becomes a tool for determining who is inside or outside acceptable boundaries, it loses its relational centre. It moves away from the biblical character of covenantal life and gravitates toward the language of control. In such moments covenant ceases to describe a shared journey of faith and begins to resemble a code of conduct.

Some have suggested that this difficulty could be resolved through the introduction of a statement of faith or doctrinal rule, which would provide explicit content for the covenantal relationship. I can understand the instinct behind this proposal. It comes from a desire for clarity, depth of engagement with Scripture, and a shared theological vocabulary. These are good instincts. Yet my own experience of life within the Baptist family leads me in a different direction.

The Baptist tradition has held me through seasons of change. I no longer believe everything I believed as a child, and I am grateful for that. I grew through exposure to new ideas, new experiences of the Spirit, and new encounters with Scripture. In each phase of that journey, I remained within a community that allowed space for growth. I did not need to sign a covenant to remain in relationship with the church that nurtured me, any more than I would need a covenant to remain in relationship with my sister. Belonging was given, not earned. It was family, not contract. If Baptist identity had been defined by a fixed doctrinal statement, I suspect that the older version of myself would have been judged unacceptable by the younger. That is not a sign of theological looseness, but a sign that life in Christ is dynamic.

This is why I remain hesitant about adding doctrinal clauses to the Baptist Union Declaration of Principle. The Declaration is far from perfect, yet it captures something essential about our identity. It states enough to orient us without attempting to fix us. It gathers us around Christ, Scripture, baptism for believers and congregational discernment, while leaving space for the Spirit to lead us into deeper truth. Most importantly, it does not constrain the work of God in the lives of those who, like me, grow and change through the years.

For safeguarding Christian orthodoxy, I look not primarily to additional doctrinal definitions but to the promises made in baptism. In baptism we confess Christ, commit ourselves to following, and receive the life of the Spirit. The shape of Christian life and belief flows from that moment. Everything else is secondary. If there is to be a defining boundary for Baptist belonging, it is found there.

I am therefore cautious about attempts to harden the edges of our identity through covenantal or doctrinal language. Baptist life at its best is relational, participatory and open to the transforming presence of God. It is a family gathered around Christ rather than a society held together by contract. It thrives on shared biblical engagement and mutual discernment, not on boundary maintenance.

The challenge facing us is not the absence of doctrinal clarity, but the loss of deeper, communal engagement with Scripture. Baptists have historically read, argued, prayed and discerned together. When we retreat from that practice, everything else begins to wobble. Recovery begins not with new rules but with renewed attention to the living Word.

Covenant in Scripture always points us back to the God who holds us despite our failures. If we are to use the word at all, it must be anchored in that reality. It must remind us that our belonging is a gift of grace, not a badge of doctrinal conformity. And if it cannot do that in our present conversations, then perhaps it is time to look again for language that better reflects who we are called to be.