Thursday, 7 July 2022

Exiles in a familiar land

A Sermon for Bloomsbury Central Baptist Church, 
10 July 2022


1 Peter 1.1-23


Do you ever have the sensation that the world you live in
            is slipping away from you,
slithering and sliding about beneath you,
            such that you feel destabilised, discombobulated, disconnected?
 
From the upheavals of the pandemic, to the war in Ukraine;
            from the shifting sands of our national politics,
            to the decline in church attendance in all the main denominations…
 
Do you ever find yourself wondering what happened to the old certainties,
            longing nostalgically for those different days
                        when you knew on what basis you stood where you stand,
                        and what it meant for your place in the world?
 
Well, I’m afraid that for now at least, those days are gone.
 
And if we’re honest, they’ve been disappearing for a while,
            as the train of Western culture has pulled out from the station of Modernity,
leaving some people stranded on the platform
            and not sure what’s happening next,
looking with confusion, envy, or derision,
            at those comfortably riding the train away from them.
 
The fact is that long-established political convictions are being re-cast,
            and treasured religious orthodoxies are being questioned
            both from within the church, as well as from without.
 
It can all seem very disorientating.
 
And then there’s politics:
            ‘Events, dear boy, events’, as Harold Macmillian may have put it.
 
Just this week, the Prime Minister resigned, or has he?
            And once again the ruling party engages its Darwinian system
            to choose me another leader that I haven’t voted for…
 
But even when we do get to vote, who should we be voting for, and on which issues?
            The question of party allegiance versus identity or single-issue politics
            continues to muddle the middle ground and drive people to the extremes.
 
The world has turned on its axis,
            and we are no longer where we once were.
 
And no amount of voting, hoping, or campaigning is going to turn it back...
 
So what does it mean to be a follower of Christ
            in this changing and uncertain world?
 
What does it mean to seek the path of faithful discipleship
            when the paths have all moved
            and the signs have all been taken down?
 
How are we to relate our faith
            to a society that seems sometimes so far removed
                        from the society we want to live in
            that we can feel like aliens and exiles in our own land?
 
London Citizens captures this conundrum in their mission
            of turning the world as it is
            into the world as it should be.
 
And this desire to make the world is better place,
            to build justice in an unjust society,
            is something that we also find in the little book we call 1 Peter,
            from which our reading came this morning.
 
Graham Stanton, the late great New Testament scholar, described this book as,
‘One of the finest literary and theological writings in the New Testament.’
 
Actually, I have a story about Graham Stanton.
            Originally from New Zealand, he taught New Testament
                        at both King’s College London and Cambridge University.
 
The College in Cambridge where he was a fellow was Fitzwilliam College.
            And my old friend Simon Perry,
                        known to many of us here at Bloomsbury as, ‘the other Simon’,
                        or ‘1 Simon’ as we might perhaps call him,
            was chaplain at Fitz before he came to be minister here at Bloomsbury;
                        and he invited me once, many years ago, to preach in his chapel at Cambridge.
 
I have always been grateful to him for not pointing out to me, until afterwards,
            that the smiling man on the front row was the great Graham Stanton himself.
 
Anyway, back to 1 Peter.
 
It’s one of those books that is easy to overlook,
            or to just concentrate on a couple of the more famous passages;
which is a shame, because it has much to say to us
            about what it means to live lives of faithful discipleship
            in the midst of uncertain and unjust times.
 
It was probably written towards the end of the first century, from Rome,
            to be circulated around a group of churches in Asia Minor. 



It lists Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia
            as the areas it is written to,
and the ordering of these probably gives us a clue
            as to the route the messenger would have taken around the major cities,
            leaving a copy of the letter with the small congregation in each before moving on.
 
Its first verse gives its author as, ‘Peter, an apostle of Jesus Christ’,
            and traditional church teaching has suggested that this should be taken at face value,
                        and that what we have here are the written words of Simon Peter himself.
 
However, there are good reasons for thinking
            that the letter might more credibly be an example
            of what is known as pseudonymnity,
                        (with a silent P, of course, as in swimming pool).
 
There was an established practice in the ancient world,
            of writing a letter as if it came
            from an already dead person of note or importance.
 
This wasn’t the same thing as deceit or forgery of course,
            because if the person was already known to be dead,
                        then no-one suddenly getting a new letter in their name
                        would think it was actually from them,
                                    writing from beyond the grave or something.
 
Rather, it’s best to think of it as a literary exercise
            in ‘what this person might have said to us if they were still alive today’.
 
We have plenty of examples of this in the New Testament,
            including, of course, 2 Peter, but also some of Paul’s letters
                        (esp. 2 Thessalonians, 1 & 2 Timothy, Titus).
 
It’s probably best to think of 1 Peter in this category;
            it’s written in the tradition of Simon Peter, but probably not by him.
 
Anyway, we do know that it’s written from Rome
            because it signs off with a greeting from the church in Babylon (5.13),
and we know that in the early church
            Babylon was often used as a cypher, or code, for Rome.
 
Interestingly, the tradition of naming the empire as ‘Babylon’ is still with us to this day.
            In Rastafarian music, you will often find them using the term ‘Babylon’
                        to refer to those human governments and systems in our own time
            which they believe are in rebellion against the rule of God.
 
In the first century, something similar was taking place,
            as the story of the Jewish exile in Babylon,
                        from several hundred years earlier,
            was used to describe the relationship between the people of God
                        and the ruling empire of Rome.
 
For the Jewish nation, the Babylonian exile had been a defining moment.
            Jerusalem had fallen to the invading army from Babylon,
            and a significant swathe of the population had been taken into exile.
 
It was whilst they were in Babylon,
            separated from their promised land,
            knowing their temple was destroyed and their king murdered,
that they developed a form of Judaism that could survive
            even when dislocated from the land of Israel itself.
 
In other words, they learned how to be the faithful people of God in exile.
 
And it is this insight which the writer of 1 Peter takes,
            and applies to those people in the congregations to whom he is writing.
 
For these early Jesus-followers of the first century,
            life was experienced as one of dislocation.
Their decision to follow the path of Christ had led to them being removed,
            forcibly on occasions, from their old lives,
            and thrust into a new way of being.
 
Because early Christians refused to worship the Emperor,
            they found that they were no longer able to access the market places,
                        because everyone was expected to make an offering to the Emperor cult
                        as part of their transactions.
 
So they faced economic isolation, and financial disadvantage,
            because of their desire to faithfully follow Christ.
 
But it was more than just economics;
            by worshipping Christ, rather than the pantheon
                        of Graeco-Roman gods of the empire,
            they found themselves at odds with their families,
                        ostracized from the friends,
                        cut off from their social support networks.
 
In many ways, the situation facing Christian converts in Asia Minor in the first century
            has resonances with the situation facing Christian converts
            in many countries around the world today.
 
So 1 Peter begins:
            ‘To the exiles of the dispersion in Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bythinia’.
 
They are exiles in their own land,
            cut off from their own culture.
 
And the writer of the letter invites them to understand this experience
            in the light of the experience of the people of God down the centuries.
 
The theological point here is that the people of God
            are always called into exile.
From ancient Babylon, to first century Asia Minor,
            to twenty-first century London;
            we are called to be the people of God, exiled within our own world.
 
And what this means for us
            is that by naming ourselves the people of Christ
            we are emphatically not anyone else’s people.
 
            Our allegiance is to Christ and to Christ alone;
                        ‘we have no king but Jesus’,
                        as the 17th century religious radicals in England used to put it.
 
            And all of society’s attempts to enslave us
                        to the ideologies of nationalism, consumerism, or militarism
                        must therefore be resisted in the name of Christ.
 
The great insight of this opening line from 1 Peter
            is that we are called into exile,
and that there will be consequences that we have to face
            for our obedience to this call.
 
However, having addressed the letter to the ‘exiles’,
            this word is then immediately qualified.
They are not just exiles, they are ‘the exiles of the dispersion’,
            or ‘the exiles of the diaspora’ to put it slightly differently.
 
And this, too, is a word which calls to mind a Jewish religious concept
            that the author wants his readers to appropriate to their own situation.
The Jewish ‘diaspora’ or ‘dispersion’ were those Jews who, in the first century,
            lived in places other than the land of Israel itself.
 
The lessons learned, and the faith formed in exile in Babylon
            had created a sense of identity for the Jewish people of God
                        that sustained them even when they were distant
                        from their temple and their promised land.
 
It still does to this day, which is why Judaism is one of the few tribal religions
            to have survived the repeated scattering of its people around the world.
 
The word that 1 Peter uses here, ‘diaspora’ or ‘dispersion’
            has a sense of sowing about it
                        – a sense of scattering seed on the land.
 
And he is inviting those
            who experience their life as followers of Christ to be one of exile,
to see themselves not as just exiles,
            but as the seeds of the good news, scattered in the world
                        to take root, to grow, and to flourish,
                        bearing the fruit of the Spirit of Christ
                        in whatever context they find themselves,
            as through their faithful and hopeful witness
                        the world as it is
                        takes another step closer to the world as it should be.
 
In an echo of the advice given by the prophet Jeremiah to the Jewish exiles in Babylon,
            those in Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia and Bithynia
            are instructed to, ‘seek the welfare of the city
                        where [they have been sent] into exile’,
            they are to ‘pray to the LORD on its behalf,
                        for in its welfare [they] will find [their] welfare.’ (Jeremiah 29.7).
 
They are to become resident aliens, rooted in the world,
            but not owned by the world.
 
There is no mandate here for isolationist Christianity,
            for the kind of community which shuts itself off from the world
                        to preserve its holiness.
 
Rather, this is a vision of a people called together from the world,
            but then sent back to the world,
            for the transformation of the world.
 
The writer then reiterates this point more strongly in the second verse of the letter,
            making absolutely sure of the theological framework
                        on which the rest of the letter will hang.
 
This verse is one of the great Trinitarian formulations of the Christian faith,
            and its force echoes down to us today from that early context.
 
He says, firstly, that the exiles of the dispersion
            are chosen and destined by God the Father.
The people of God exist because God has called them into existence.
 
And we, like Israel of old, like the Christians of the first century,
            are called into being by the call of God;
called to be God’s people, to have no other gods,
            and to give our allegiance to none other.
 
This means that we belong to a people
            who are constituted unlike all other peoples
            in the history of humanity.
 
We are not a community gathered around nationality, military might,
            territorial belonging, conquest, or expansion;
neither are we sustained by walls, weapons, or warfare.
 
Rather, we are God’s people, called from among the nations,
            to live as aliens and exiles in the midst of a hostile world.
 
We are defined neither by left nor right,
            not by colour of skin nor colours of flag.
 
We are sustained by grace and peace,
            called to be a people of grace,
            and a community of peace.
 
We are called to resist narratives of violent struggle
            or exclusionist politics.
 
We are called to be a different and distinct people,
            in the world but not of it,
to be a people who embody the biblical politics of peace,
            and to dwell non-violently among the nations
                        as aliens and exiles in their midst,
                        and as visible signs of God’s intent for grace and peace.
 
But how on earth are we do this?
            Well, says the author, we can do this
            because we are sanctified by the Spirit.
 
Our hearts are purified by the Spirit of Christ at work within us,
            forming us from the inside out to be God’s people.
 
It is the Spirit of Christ who sustains us through our suffering,
            the Spirit who protects our inner being
                        through the fires of persecution,
            the Spirit who reveals to us the truth of salvation
                        that comes to us from beyond our current experience.
 
Sometimes it can seem as if everywhere we turn,
            we are being promised or sold dreams of salvation.
 
From political solutions, to bespoke religions, to economic miracles
            – we are surrounded by people promising the earth.
 
But we are enabled to resist the lure of such lies
            because we are sanctified by the Spirit of Christ,
            who dwells in our hearts and assures us of our salvation.
 
And it is in the strength of the Spirit
            that we are called to obedience to Christ;
and it is the wind of the Spirit that scatters us in the world
            as resident aliens,
            as exiles of the dispersion.
 
We are called to an appropriate sense of separation from society,
            to live by a different script,
            to embody an alternative narrative.
 
But our call is not to form holy enclaves,
            or to distance ourselves from society.
 
Rather, our call is to obedience to Christ,
            who came from heaven to the earth.
 
So we too are called to the earth,
            we are sown among the nations to take root and bear fruit,
            and to live and work for the transformation of society,
            for the good of the city and culture to which we have been sent.
 
And so as political fever takes root in our media,
            as cynicism and disconnectedness threaten to stifle and choke
                        the fledgling shoots of hope,
            we are called to be rooted and grounded in love (Eph 3.17, Col 1.23).
 
We are called to be witnesses to the truth
            that there is another way.
 
We are called to become involved in the processes of our world,
            to challenge and change them
            into the likeness of the kingdom of Christ
                        where our citizenship is already secure.
 
So, let’s not be afraid to talk politics.
 
And if party politics isn’t your thing,
            then join me in becoming involved in the transformation of society
            through our church’s membership of London Citizens.
 
Book a conversation with me, or with Lucy,
            and let’s start bringing the world as it should be,
            into being in the world as it is.
Let’s take action together that the kingdom of God may come on earth,
            as it is in heaven.
 
So join with our work in addressing the situation facing refugees;
            or become an advocate for addressing climate change,
                        which is directly affecting so many people around the globe;
            or take up the banner of our commitment to be a Kairos congregation,
                        and become more involved in the situation facing Palestinians.
 
Surely a church such as ours should be leading the way
            in addressing these kind of issues – and in many ways we are.
 
But we can only do so if we all hear the call on our lives…
 
We are called to be the people of God,
            scattered in the world for the good of the world,
sanctified by the Spirit of Christ,
            to live lives of radical obedience to the prince of peace.
 
This is our calling, and it is our task.
 

Sin and Forgiveness

Bloomsbury Central Baptist Church
2nd July 2022, 11.00am


Matthew 18:15-20   "If another member of the church sins against you, go and point out the fault when the two of you are alone. If the member listens to you, you have regained that one.  16 But if you are not listened to, take one or two others along with you, so that every word may be confirmed by the evidence of two or three witnesses.  17 If the member refuses to listen to them, tell it to the church; and if the offender refuses to listen even to the church, let such a one be to you as a Gentile and a tax collector.  18 Truly I tell you, whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven.  19 Again, truly I tell you, if two of you agree on earth about anything you ask, it will be done for you by my Father in heaven.  20 For where two or three are gathered in my name, I am there among them."

Exodus 20:17  You shall not covet your neighbour's house; you shall not covet your neighbour’s wife, or male or female slave, or ox, or donkey, or anything that belongs to your neighbour.

Romans 13:8-14  Owe no one anything, except to love one another; for the one who loves another has fulfilled the law.  9 The commandments, "You shall not commit adultery; You shall not murder; You shall not steal; You shall not covet"; and any other commandment, are summed up in this word, "Love your neighbour as yourself."  10 Love does no wrong to a neighbour; therefore, love is the fulfilling of the law.  11  Besides this, you know what time it is, how it is now the moment for you to wake from sleep. For salvation is nearer to us now than when we became believers;  12 the night is far gone, the day is near. Let us then lay aside the works of darkness and put on the armour of light;  13 let us live honourably as in the day, not in revelling and drunkenness, not in debauchery and licentiousness, not in quarrelling and jealousy.  14 Instead, put on the Lord Jesus Christ, and make no provision for the flesh, to gratify its desires.

The film Beyond Forgiving [1] depicts the journey of two South Africans
            to bring healing and reconciliation to their country post-Apartheid.
 
Letlapa and Ginn form an unlikely pair:
            a black atheist man and a white Christian woman.
 
In 1993, during the post Apartheid years, Letlapa,
            then director of operations for the military wing
                        of the Pan-Africanist Congress,
            ordered reprisal massacres
                        in response to the killing of black school children.
Ginn lost her only daughter in one of these.
            And many years later she met and came to forgive Letlapa.
 
We’re going to watch a couple of clips from the film now,
            as a way into our consideration of our passages for today
            which take us to the hearts of sin and forgiveness.
 
Beyond Forgiving Trailer
 
Beyond Forgiving clip
 
I don’t know how the idea of Ginn forgiving Letlapa makes you feel,
            but in me it stirs mixed emotions.
On the one hand I’m deeply moved
            by the transformation that her actions have brought about;
            not only in her life, or indeed his life,
                        but in the lives of so many others who they have affected
                                    as they have learned to work together,
                        telling the story of their journey
                                    towards forgiveness and reconciliation.
 
But on the other hand I find myself feeling unaccountably angry,
            because it seems as if, somehow, the rules of justice have been violated.
‘Where is the righteous anger?’ I want to cry.
            ‘Why should he be free and laughing,
            while her daughter is long dead by his command?’
 
And therein lies the complexity
            of forgiveness and reconciliation.
It is never straightforward, it is never comfortable, it is never easy.
 
And yet, still, somehow, we have to learn to live with conflict,
            we have to learn to live with anger, hatred, and betrayal.
We have to learn to live with emotions
            that demand revenge in the name of justice,
and we have to learn to live with logic
            that demands justice in the name revenge.
 
There is a tendency to divide conflict into two categories;
            on the one hand we have conflict at a community level,
                        which encompasses everything from a riot to a war,
                        and where the people involved have little or no personal knowledge
                        of those they are in conflict with;
            and on the other hand we have conflict at a personal level,
                        which involves particular disagreements
                        between people know each other well.
 
Only some of us will ever have direct experience of community-level conflict,
            but my suspicion is that all of us are well acquainted
            with conflict that occurs at a personal level.
 
We all know the difficulties involved
            in maintaining relationships over the long term,
                        whether within a marriage, or a friendship group,
                        or an intentional community such as a church.
It is all-too-easy for people to find themselves in conflict
            with those whom they see regularly.
 
The sin of covetousness,
            of desiring that which is not ours,
is at the root of so much violence and discord.
 
The interesting thing about the story of Ginn and Letlapa, of course,
            is that what started out as a community conflict between strangers,
            evolved into a personal conflict between two individuals,
            as part of its journey towards reconciliation:
                        The communal became individual.
            But I think the same can also apply the other way:
                        because individual conflicts never occur in an isolation bubble.
            A sin against the one, is a sin against the many.
 
And so we come to our passage from Matthew’s gospel,
            which seems, on the surface at least,
            to simply offer a practical mechanism
                        for dealing with conflict when it arrives.
 
If another member of the church sins against you…” Jesus begins,
            and the subtext here, of course, is that ‘if’ really means ‘when’…
I’m afraid there is no such a thing as the conflict-free church,
            and even if there was, as the old adage goes:
            ‘if you find it, don’t join it, because you’ll ruin it’.
 
The reality is that at some point, someone who you share worship with,
            someone who you break bread and share wine with,
is going to say something or do something
            which will give you cause for grievance.
It’s going to happen.
            The question is, what to do about it?
 
One route might be to have a massive row,
            to stand up for ourselves,
            to fight back, bite back, make them see how wrong they are.
 
Tempting… but, perhaps, not very ‘Christian’?
 
Much more likely, we will ‘take it on the chin’,
            or ‘turn the other cheek’, to misquote the sermon on the mount.
Much more likely, we will take the anger into ourselves,
            seething quietly within,
            whilst never letting slip our well-practiced ‘Christian smile’.
Much more likely, if we are strategic and careful,
            we will find ways of distancing ourselves from the person,
                        walking away from groups where we will encounter them,
                        maybe even to the extent of leaving the fellowship altogether.
 
We divide ourselves against ourselves and within ourselves,
            taking for our own what is not ours
as we seek the vengeance that is God’s alone to dispense or withhold.
 
Well, says Jesus in our reading today, neither of these are the right approach.
            And so we get his famous and oh-so-practical solution:
Firstly, try at the earliest opportunity to resolve the difficulty one-to-one.
If that doesn’t work, the second step is to take a couple of others,
            to engage in mediation with a view to restoring the broken relationship.
Only finally, if neither of these work, does it become a public matter,
            with the community becoming involved in the discussion.
 
Simples, no?
 
Well, no, and, yes.
 
The thing is, if we try to apply Jesus’ advice in a mechanical way,
            it can too quickly become just another mechanism for social control.
Comply, or you’re out.
            If the pastor comes to see you, and you don’t conform,
            before you know it, everyone knows, and you’re persona non grata.
 
From the ‘shunning’ practices of the Anabaptists,
            to the Excommunication of the Catholics,
this teaching has been used down the centuries
            to both require and enforce compliance.
 
Which is, I think, a long way from its origins.
 
The community that Jesus is speaking to here
            is a community seeking to hold together great diversity and complexity.
It is a community that is struggling to be inclusive
            of those whom others would never tolerate.
 
And the insight that come to us, [2]
            is that if we are to be a community of genuine inclusivity,
                        encompassing not just the strong but the weak,
                        not just the powerful but the vulnerable,
            then we cannot afford to overlook the sin that seeks to take hold in our midst,
                        because if we do, it has the capacity to destroy
                        the good which is coming into being among us.
 
The confronting of sin, and the challenging the person trapped in it,
            is not about enforcing compliance,
                        but is rather about offering compassion.
 
The threat of making a person ‘like a tax collector or a gentile’
            is not about shunning or excommunicating them,
                        it is not about throwing them out of the church,
            rather, it is the issuing of a stark call to them
                        to return home,
                        and to be reconciled to the community that they have wounded.
 
Whether or not we have the resolve and courage to seek reconciliation
            with the one who has sinned against us,
            is therefore a mark of the kind of community we are.
 
To put it another way:
            Do we love each other so intensely,
                        that we refuse to risk ignoring the one who is going astray?
            Do we refuse to harbour resentment,
                        seeking instead the more difficult path of reconciliation?
 
This is not about eliminating the conflict that comes from sin,
            or suppressing it, or ignoring it, or denying it.
It’s about dealing with it,
            because the community that it threatens to destroy
            is too precious to us to abandon to the destructive power of sin.
 
Christians must take seriously what it means to confront their enemies well,
            because this is the only way in which the damage already done,
                        stands any chance of moving towards healing.
It is the only way in which the vulnerable
            will ever receive justice,
and it is the only way in which the perpetrator
            can be restored to their proper place within the community.
 
Too often, when we talk of forgiveness,
            we think of it in terms of ‘papering over the cracks’,
too often we define forgiveness in terms of ‘forgive and forget’,
            as saying to the perpetrator of hurt
            that it doesn’t matter, that it’s forgotten.
 
But this is not what Christian forgiveness is about.
            Because sin and hurt, and pain and wrong, do matter,
                        and they cannot always be forgotten.
 
But they can be addressed,
            carefully, and with good process.
And from that process, there is the possibility
                        that genuine forgiveness can emerge,
            which has the potential to liberate those entangled in the mess of sin
                        from the chains that bind them to hurt and pain.
 
Only through such process can the path to peace emerge.
            And the peace that Jesus offers,
                        is not simply the peace that emerges from the absence of violent response.
            The peace that Jesus offers is not the peace of the capitulator,
                        nor is it the peace of the person so bullied and coerced
                        that they have lost their capacity to fight back.
            Rather, the peace of Jesus
                        is nonviolent because it is based on truth,
                                    and on the telling of truth.
 
As Desmond Tutu and Nelson Mandela discovered in South Africa,
            with the establishment of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission.
Only truth has the capacity to effectively counter violence.
            Only truth can un-spin the web of deceit which ensnares the unwary
                        in its violent embrace.
 
Covetousness is a secret sin of the heart,
            the desiring of that which is not ours,
            whether that is land, power, possessions, or status.
 
But truth brings that which is hidden into the light.
 
Even love, if it is love without truth, can be as dangerous
            as any open hostility.
 
If peace between the brothers and sisters of Jesus
            is to be real, it must be peace without illusion.
 
Truth is key to reconciliation,
            which is why Jesus instructs the person who has been wronged
                        to take with them ‘one or two’,
            so that together they form the ‘two or three’ witnesses
                        stipulated by the book of Deuteronomy (19.15)
                        as necessary for the establishment of truthful testimony.
 
Truth-telling in the face of conflict,
            is a gift that the community of Christ’s people can offer to the world.
If we can learn to model it between ourselves,
            and learn what it is to inhabit the peace of Christ,
then we become equipped and prepared to live that peace into being
            in all areas and spheres of our lives.
 
How can the world be changed?
            How can we make any difference to the conflicts that divide humanity?
Well, says Jesus, it begins with us, here and now.
            It begins with those who follow him,
                        as we learn what it means to relate in new ways,
            as we see relationships transformed,
                        and healing brought through truth to those who are divided.
 
And yet, the truth is often the last thing
            most of us want to know about ourselves!
We may say that the truth saves us,
            but in fact we know that any truth,
                        particularly the truth that is in Jesus,
            is as disturbing, as it is fulfilling.
 
How will we react,
            if someone comes to us,
            to point out to us the error of our own ways?
How will we respond,
            when someone tells us how much we have hurt them?
Self-righteousness is only ever a small step away,
            as the shutters come down,
            and we retreat to our world of illusion
                        where we are the stars of our own little universe
                        with everyone else playing merely supporting roles.
 
And even those who take seriously the journey towards truth,
            those who take Jesus at his word when he says
            that ‘the truth shall set you free’(Jn 8.32),
will find that the truth is often painful,
            and that the revelation of our own inner capacity to harm others,
                        and to engage in acts of destruction
                        against those we love, as well as those we hate,
            is a truth that comes only by great effort,
                        and by the grace of God.
 
But this is why Jesus insists that those who would follow him
            cannot let sins go unchallenged.
If we fail to challenge one another in our sins,
            we in fact abandon one another to our sins.
We show how little we love each another,
            when we refuse to engage in the hard work of reconciliation.
 
And yet, says Jesus, we cannot afford to ignore this,
            because our actions here today have eternal consequences.
 
When we loose someone from the chains of sin,
            when we cut the bonds of behaviours
            that bind people into destructive patterns,
then we loose them for eternity.
 
When we cut someone free from the web of deceit
            with the sharp edged sword of truth,
            they are free indeed.
 
The kingdom of Heaven breaks into our midst
            when people take decisive action to bind the Satan’s power
                        to deceive, distort, and demean.
And Heaven and earth collide
            when people find release to the new life
            that is theirs in Christ Jesus
 


[2] What follows draws on Stanley Hauerwas, Matthew, SCM Theological Commentary, pp. 165-166.