John 4.46–54
2 Kings 5.1–19a
There is something almost
deceptively understated about our gospel story for today,
as we continue our journey
through John’s gospel.
John doesn’t present it as a
public confrontation or a dramatic display.
No crowds gather. No
controversy erupts.
There are no raised voices, no
visible opponents.
Instead, the story unfolds
quietly, almost privately,
as though we have been allowed
to overhear an encounter
rather than witness a
performance.
Jesus has returned to Cana of
Galilee,
the place where water once
became wine.
And it’s hard not to hear the
echo of that earlier sign.
That first miracle had been
about abundance,
about joy arriving
unnoticed at the edge of a celebration,
about quiet
transformation rather than spectacle.
Now Jesus is back in the same
place, but the mood is different.
This time the air is heavy
with fear.
And a royal official comes to
Jesus because his son is dying.
John gives us just enough
information to complicate our response.
This is not a desperate
peasant with nowhere else to turn.
This man is part of Herod’s
administration, close to power,
embedded in a compromised
system of rule
that maintained order through
violence and inequality.
He represents privilege, authority, and proximity to empire.
And yet none of that matters
now.
Because power cannot protect a
child from death.
Status cannot bargain with
mortality.
And influence cannot command
life to stay.
When a son is at the point of
death, every hierarchy collapses.
All the leverage that usually
works for this man has failed him.
So he does the only thing left to him.
He travels.
The journey from Capernaum to
Cana is around twenty miles,
uphill most of the way.
This is not a casual visit.
It’s a journey shaped by
urgency, anxiety, and hope.
He comes because he has heard
something.
Perhaps a story circulating
beyond official channels.
Maybe a rumour that this
Galilean teacher
can do what no
court physician can manage.
And he begs Jesus to come down
with him. To be present.
To do what healers are
supposed to do.
To stand at the bedside. To
intervene directly.
But Jesus doesn’t comply.
Instead he offers theology
rather than healing:
“Unless you see signs and
wonders, you will not believe.”
At first hearing, these words
sound abrupt, even unkind.
But perhaps Jesus isn’t
dismissing the man
so much as naming something
that runs deeper than this one
encounter.
Jesus exposes an instinct that
shapes human life again and again.
We want proof before we trust.
We want certainty before we
commit.
We want to see before we will
believe.
The official does not argue
theology.
He does not debate signs.
He simply presses his need.
“Sir, come down before my
child dies.”
And then Jesus does something
unexpected.
He refuses to go.
He withholds the thing the man
thinks he needs most.
There is no journey, no healing
touch.
No visible intervention.
Instead, Jesus offers only a
word.
“Go,” He says, “Your son will
live.”
This is the moment everything
hinges on.
John tells us, almost quietly,
that the man believed the word
Jesus spoke
and started on his way.
He leaves Cana with nothing
tangible in his hands.
No proof. No confirmation.
Just a promise spoken by
someone he barely knows.
The reassurance comes later.
And it comes through his servants,
who meet him on the road.
Through the careful matching
of times and hours.
Through the slow realisation
that the healing happened
at the exact
moment Jesus spoke.
In this story, belief precedes
evidence.
Trust comes before
explanation.
That matters, because John is never
interested in miracles for their own sake.
This isn’t about supernatural
power on display.
Rather, this is about what
belief looks like when certainty is withheld.
It’s about what kind of faith
reshapes a life.
John even tells us that the
whole household comes to believe.
And that detail is easy to
skim past, but it’s crucial.
Households were not just private units of affection.
They were economic units,
social units,
places where patterns of life were
formed and reinforced.
Faith here is not a private conviction.
It is a reordering of daily
life.
And then, at this point in the
story, John quietly widens the lens.
Having told us that the whole
household came to believe,
he then moves on, as though
that were self-explanatory.
But it isn’t. Not really.
In the ancient world, a
household was not just a family gathered around a table.
It was a web of relationships.
Kin and servants. Dependants and labourers.
People with very different
degrees of power,
bound together under one roof
and one authority.
When John says that the
household believes,
he’s not describing a moment
of collective piety.
He is describing a change in
the shape of everyday life.
The royal official’s authority
doesn’t disappear.
But it is now exercised
differently.
His power is no longer the final word in the house.
It’s been relativised by a
promise he didn’t control
and a healing he didn’t
manage.
Belief, in this sense, is not
simply
about adding a religious layer
to an existing structure.
Rather, it’s about allowing the structure itself to be questioned.
And this matters for us,
because we are also part of
households.
Not just domestic ones, but
institutional ones.
Congregations, workplaces,
universities, neighbourhoods.
Each with their own hierarchies, habits, and unspoken rules
about who is listened to and
who is overlooked.
If belief reshapes households,
then it asks uncomfortable
questions of us.
How is authority exercised
among us.
Whose experience carries
weight.
Who is expected to adapt, and
who is assumed to be the norm.
This is where the gospel
quietly becomes political.
Not in slogans or party
allegiance,
but in the patient reordering
of relationships.
In the slow work of learning to live differently together.
The healing of one child
becomes the beginning of a new social reality.
Not because everything is
suddenly perfect,
but because something decisive
has shifted.
A word has been trusted.
A journey has been taken.
And life has entered the house
in a new way.
This becomes even clearer when
we place this story
alongside our Old Testament
reading from 2 Kings,
the story of Naaman the
Syrian.
Another powerful man. Another
military leader.
Another figure accustomed to
being obeyed.
And again, another man whose
healing
depends on voices he is
tempted to ignore.
Naaman’s story turns on the
word of an enslaved girl,
taken from her homeland by
violence.
It turns on servants who dare
to speak truth to power.
It turns on a prophet who
refuses to come out and perform.
Naaman expects drama.
He expects recognition.
He expects healing to arrive
in a form proportionate to his status.
Instead, he receives a message
carried by others,
a simple instruction that
feels almost insulting in its ordinariness.
And like the royal official
encountering Jesus,
Naaman must decide whether he
will trust a word that unsettles his pride.
In both stories, healing does
not reinforce hierarchy.
It disrupts it.
It’s worth also noticing that
in both these stories,
healing does not arrive
without cost.
We often imagine healing as
pure gain.
As something added.
As an uncomplicated good.
But for both Naaman and the
royal official,
healing comes alongside a kind
of loss.
Naaman is healed of his
disease,
but he is also stripped of his
illusions.
He loses the fantasy that power
can command grace.
He loses the assurance that
his status will be honoured.
He must submit to a process
that feels humiliating
before it becomes life-giving.
The royal official, too, gains
his son’s life,
but he loses something else
along the way.
He loses control.
He loses the ability to manage
the outcome.
He must entrust the most precious thing in his life
to a word spoken by someone
outside his world of influence.
In both cases, healing
destabilises as much as it restores.
And that is important,
because it names something we
often prefer not to acknowledge.
Justice, like healing, can feel
like loss
to those who have benefitted
from the way things are.
When hierarchies are disrupted,
those who have lived
comfortably within them
may experience that change as
disorientation.
As uncertainty.
As the unsettling
sense that familiar patterns no longer hold.
But this does not mean the
healing is wrong.
It means it is real.
Racial justice work often
falters at precisely this point.
Not because people disagree
with equality in principle,
but because the emotional cost
of change is underestimated.
It can feel like ground
shifting under our feet.
Like authority being
questioned.
Like a loss of innocence about
how our institutions function.
The gospel does not deny that
discomfort.
It names it.
But it refuses to make comfort the measure of faithfulness.
Neither Naaman nor the royal
official
is asked to feel good about
the process.
They are asked to trust it.
And perhaps that is a word some
of us need to hear.
That the unease we feel
when long-standing assumptions
are challenged
is not necessarily a sign that
something has gone wrong.
It may be evidence that
something truthful is taking place.
Healing that leaves everything
exactly as it was is not healing.
It is maintenance.
The stories we are given today
invite us into something braver.
Into a form of faith that
allows power to be unsettled,
pride to be
exposed,
and control to be
relinquished,
so that life can break in
where it was previously constrained.
God’s life-giving power flows
not through status or spectacle,
but through trust, humility,
and attentiveness to marginal
voices.
And this is where Racial
Justice Sunday
presses in with particular
force.
Because racism is not sustained
only by overt hostility.
It is sustained by habits of
disbelief.
By systems that decide in advance
whose testimony is credible
and whose requires
verification.
By assumptions about who needs evidence
and who is believed by
default.
These stories ask an
uncomfortable question.
Whose word do we trust?
There is a subtle temptation
here,
especially in churches like
ours.
We value thoughtfulness. We
care about nuance.
We want to get things right.
We read, we reflect, we
discuss.
And yet the instinct Jesus
names can still surface among us.
We are reluctant to act unless
there is data.
Unless there is consensus.
Unless there is reassurance
that we will not make mistakes.
And all of those things have
their place.
But they can also become ways
of delaying trust,
of postponing response,
of asking those who experience racial injustice
to keep telling their stories
until we feel sufficiently convinced.
The royal official is not
offered that option.
Jesus does not say, “Stay here
while I prove it to you.”
Jesus says, “Go.”
And going involves risk.
It means acting as though the
word is true
before it has been confirmed
by experience.
It asks for something deeper
than intellectual agreement.
It asks for alignment.
In John’s story, belief
reshapes a household.
In our context, belief
reshapes communities.
It asks how our shared life
might be reorganised
by the testimonies we hear.
It asks what practices might
need to change.
What voices might need to be
centred.
What comforts might need to be
surrendered.
There is another detail that
deepens this challenge.
Jesus heals at a distance.
He doesn’t go to Capernaum.
He doesn’t see the child.
The healing crosses absence and space.
Which tells us something vital.
God’s work is not limited by
proximity or familiarity.
We do not have to share someone’s experience
in order to trust their word.
The royal official never
witnesses the healing.
He hears about it later.
John calls this healing a sign.
Not an ending, but a pointer.
A sign gestures beyond itself,
towards a world reordered by
trust,
by boundary-crossing grace,
by life that refuses to be
contained by inherited power structures.
On Racial Justice Sunday,
we are not claiming the work
is complete.
We are acknowledging that the
sign still points ahead.
Towards communities where
marginalised voices are trusted.
Towards belief that takes the form of costly action.
Towards life, full and
abundant,
breaking through where it was
least expected.
The royal official walks home
carrying only a promise.
Perhaps that is the invitation
offered to us as well.
To walk the road of justice
not because everything is
settled,
but because we have trusted
the word that life is possible,
and have chosen to begin the
journey.
Amen.
Let us pray:
God of life,
we come before you carrying
many words,
some we have spoken aloud,
and others that have lodged
quietly within us.
We thank you for the stories we
have heard through our lives,
for journeys taken in fear and
hope,
for promises trusted before they were proven,
for healing that crossed
distance and expectation.
We confess that we often want
reassurance
before we are willing to
trust,
clarity before we are willing to act,
and certainty before we are
willing to change.
We confess that we are shaped
by habits we did not choose,
by systems that advantage some
and silence others,
by assumptions about whose voices carry weight
and whose stories need extra
proof.
Forgive us when we demand signs
and wonders
before we will listen well.
Forgive us when discomfort becomes an excuse for delay.
Forgive us when we cling to control
rather than entrusting
ourselves to your word of life.
Teach us what it means to
believe
not only with our thoughts,
but with our steps,
our shared life,
and the way we order our relationships.
Give us courage to walk the
road
before everything is resolved.
Give us humility to hear testimony
that unsettles our
assumptions.
Give us patience to stay open
when healing feels costly.
We pray for households,
communities, and institutions,
that they may be reshaped by
justice,
softened by truth,
and opened to voices long
ignored.
Where there is fear, speak
life.
Where there is silence,
release truth.
Where there is weariness,
renew hope.
And as we prepare to leave this
place,
send us out carrying not
certainty,
but trust.
Not control,
but commitment.
So that life, full and
abundant,
may take root among us,
and your healing work
may continue on the road
ahead.
Amen.
No comments:
Post a Comment