Tuesday 27 June 2023

A eucharist of emancipation

A sermon for Bloomsbury Central Baptist Church
2nd July 2023


Isaiah 55.1-9  
Matthew 14.13-21  

The cost of living crisis which is currently affecting our country
          has meant that many of us are making savings wherever we can,
and the king of money-saving top-tips surely has to be, of course,
          the great Martin Lewis, whose MoneySavingExpert website
          made him one of the most valued, and valuable, people in the country,
 
These days, if Liz and I want to buy anything,
          from a holiday, to a new phone, to a meal out
the chances are that we can generate some kind of discount code or voucher
          that will get us a bit of money off the listed price!
 
Well, the net result of this (if you’ll pardon the pun),
          is that our home email address has become the registered recipient
                   for a seemingly endless plethora
of special offer after special offer;
Some related to things we might be interested in,
          and some where you just have to wonder what they were thinking
                   when they sent that particular offer to us!?
 
Well, a quick sort through these offers
          reveals a wonderful and beguiling set of invitations
          to apparently get something for nothing
 
From the traditional and clichéd BOGOF – Buy One Get One Free
          to the more sophisticated free trials, introductory offers,
                   and 50% off your main meal (excluding drinks and starters)
I could almost start to convince myself
          that there is indeed such a thing as a free lunch!
 
But of course, it doesn’t work that way.
          And whist there are some great offers our there
          there’s always a catch, somewhere along the line…
 
Someone, somewhere, is going to try and make some money from me
          if I respond to these invitations to temptation.
 
And it’s always been the case, hasn’t it,
          that you get nuffin for nuffin?
 
At least, that’s what we’ve always been warned…
 
So, you can imagine the surprise of the ancient Israelites,
          when the prophet in Babylon
suddenly started calling out in the market place,
          inviting them to come buy without money,
          to eat without payment!
 
The normal market stall holders’ cries of,
‘Roll up, roll up, for the bargain of the century!’
‘Cheap at half the price!’
‘Buy today, gone tomorrow!’
 
Were suddenly overshadowed,
          by the prophet’s invitation to buy without money.
 
As Eugene Petersen paraphrases it:
 
"Hey there! All who are thirsty,
  come to the water!
Are you penniless?
   Come anyway—buy and eat!
Come, buy your drinks, buy wine and milk.
   Buy without money—everything's free!
Why do you spend your money on junk food,
   your hard-earned cash on candy floss?
Listen to me, listen well: Eat only the best,
   fill yourself with only the finest."

This was the unexpected cry of the prophet of the Lord
          to the Jewish people in the market place of Babylon
          some 540 years before the birth of Jesus
 
At this point in history, it has to be said,
         things were not looking too good for the people of Israel:
 
Nearly 50 years earlier, the great, beautiful and lavish temple of Solomon
         had been destroyed by the Babylonian king Nebuchadnezzar
and the city of Jerusalem had been laid waste,
         with its defensive walls reduced to rubble.
 
The leaders of the people,
         the politicians, the civil servants and the priests
had all been carted off into exile in Babylon,
                             where they had grown old and died,
leaving their children and grandchildren
                   with nothing but the memory of a now lost land, city and temple.
 
These words of our prophet, to come and buy without money
          came to a people who had lost everything.
They came to people who had had to struggle
          to make a new life for themselves
          in exile in Babylon.
 
The words of the prophet came to people
          who had no land, to people who couldn’t grow crops,
to people who had nowhere to graze their sheep and their goats.
 
These were people who knew full well that nothing comes from nothing,
          because they had lived with nothing for generations
          as an oppressed underclass in a foreign land.
 
In many ways, their situation is analogous
          to those in our own land
                   who have come here as asylum seekers,
          or those who have been brought here through duress or deception,
                   to work as economic slaves in shadow-industries
                   such as the sex trade, or other unregulated labour markets.
 
It matters not one bit if you were a doctor or a lawyer back home,
          whether you were a bright pupil at school, or the beauty queen of your town.
It matters not one bit whether you owned cars and houses and animals,
          or whether your parents loved you and wanted the best for you.
 
As an unregistered exile in a foreign land,
          you can’t work, you can’t earn, you can’t own,
          you are reliant on illegal work,
                             or on the charity of others,
                    to feed yourself, your family, and your children.
And you are always under the threat of being declared illegal
          and imprisoned and deported.
 
Imagine how an invitation
          to come and eat without cost, or to buy without money
would sound to such exiles in our world,
and you get some idea
          of how the prophet’s words sounded to the ancient Jews
                   living in exile in Babylon.
 
Into their hopeless situation
          the prophet of the Lord dared to declare words of hopeful invitation.
 
Into their poverty
          his message of food for the hungry and water for the thirsty
          would have seemed like an impossible pipe-dream,
                   a fantasy incapable of fulfilment.
 
And yet, the prophet declares that these are the words of the Lord,
          and he says that the invitation he is issuing comes not from him,
                   but from the Lord God himself.
 
This message of hope in hopelessness
          is not some idle daydream of wish-fulfilment,
but an invitation from the Living God
          to experience life differently.
 
And as such it is one which cannot simply be dismissed
          as the hopeful ramblings of a hopeless dreamer.
 
The invitation to eat without cost, to drink freely of water,
          points the exiles to a hopeful future;
to a time when once again they will be restored to their land,
          when they will have the freedom to plant crops and to harvest them,
          freedom to own sheep and goats, and to graze them on their own fields
 
It points, in other words, to the end of exile.
 
The prophet is saying to people who have lost hope,
          under the oppression of the evil empire,
that the empire will not have this power over them forever,
          and that one day God’s freedom will come to them.
 
And, of course, from a historical point of view,
          this is exactly what happened.
The exile in Babylon ended shortly after these words were spoken,
          as the new king Cyrus allowed the displaced people
          to return to their land, and to rebuild their temple.
 
But the prophet’s words don’t just point to a hopeful future,
          they aren’t simply words of comfort for the afflicted,
          a promise of pie-in-the-sky-by-and-by.
 
You see, they also spell out the responsibility
          which the people of God must take in the here-and-now
          for all those who continue to find themselves exiled and enslaved.
 
The prophet continues:
 
Pay attention, come close now,
   listen carefully to my life-giving, life-nourishing words.
I'm making a lasting covenant commitment with you,
   the same that I made with David: sure, solid, enduring love.
I set him up as a witness to the nations,
   made him a prince and leader of the nations,
And now I'm doing it to you:
   You'll summon nations you've never heard of,
and nations who've never heard of you
   will come running to you
Because of me, your God,
   because The Holy of Israel has honoured you."
 6-7Seek God while he's here to be found,
   pray to him while he's close at hand.
Let the wicked abandon their way of life
   and the evil their way of thinking.
Let them come back to God, who is merciful,
   come back to our God, who is lavish with forgiveness.
 
The words of the prophet summon the people of God in all ages
          to take seriously what it means to be good news to all people.
 
Just as the Lord has summoned the ancient people of Israel
          to the good news of his kingdom
                    by restoring them to their land
          where they could eat and drink together in freedom from slavery;
so also the people of God are to continue the task
          of summoning all the nations of the earth
to join them in this journey from slavery to freedom,
          in this journey from Babylon to promised land.
 
This is not a gift from God to a select group of people,
          it is an invitation which God issues to all God’s people,
          and which God expects them to then send out into the whole earth,
calling all peoples to join in God’s kingdom of good news
          where the water of life is freely available
          and where bread is broken and shared by all who come to the table.
 
Five hundred years after the prophet in Babylon
          summoned the people of God to eat and drink freely
the food and water of the kingdom of God,
Another prophet in Israel repeated the challenge
          to take that good news and send it out into the whole world
 
Not in a market place, but on a hillside,
          not to exiles in Babylon,
          but to a group of people who were far from home with no food to eat.
 
Our story this morning from Matthew’s gospel,
                   of Jesus’ miraculous multiplication of food,
          echoes the invitation to the exiles in Babylon,
                    because it, too, is a story of exodus from slavery.
 
When Matthew tells us of Jesus taking bread and fish, and blessing them,
          and using them to feed the hungry multitude on the hillside,
he wants us to remember the words of the prophet to the exiles,
          inviting them to eat and drink freely of that which comes from God.
 
But there is another layer of memory here too,
          as Matthew invites us to remember a different,
                   and even more ancient, story of freedom.
 
It’s not just Babylon that’s in view here, it’s also Egypt;
          where God’s people were enslaved for generations
          before being led by Moses through the wilderness,
                   on their journey from slavery to promised land.
 
We know this story well, as did the first readers of Matthew’s gospel:
          Moses led the children of Israel through the waters of the Red Sea,
                   and on into the inhospitable wilderness,
          where they were fed with manna and quails (Ex 16, Num 11)
                   which fell to the earth in abundance,
                   but needed to be consumed that day,
                             as they would go bad overnight.
 
We don’t really know what Manna was,
          and we can be fairly sure that quail are birds,
but the Jewish tradition was to remember
          the manna as ‘bread’ from the ground (Deut 8.3),
          and the quail as food ‘from the sea’ (Wisd. 19.12).
 
And it’s here that we find a link with the bread and the fish
          that Jesus took and multiplied to feed the people on the mountain.
 
Like Moses, Jesus doesn’t work alone in his provision of sustenance
          to those who are in need of help.
 
The Old Testament book of Numbers tells us that Moses asked the Lord,
          ‘Where am I to get meat to give to all this people?’
and that the Lord instructed him to commission 70 elders
          to share in his task, asking him rhetorically,
                   ‘Is the Lord’s power limited?’ (Num. 11.13-17)
 
Jesus has an analogous conversation with his disciples,
          which similarly ends with him commissioning them
          to share in his work of feeding those who are hungry on the hillside.
 
He says to them,
          ‘the crowds need not go away, you give them something to eat’ (13.16).
 
And so the twelve disciples distribute the food,
          and collect twelve baskets of uneaten food at the end
symbolising the fulfilment of God’s promise to the 12 tribes,
          that they shall eat their fill and bless the Lord their God (Deut 8.10). [1]
 
But Matthew’s story of bread and fishes (fish?) on a hillside
          doesn’t just echo the prophet in Babylon,
          it doesn’t just reference the exodus from Egypt.
It also looks forwards,
          to a story that is told later in the gospel,
          which becomes a significant part of the life
                   of the community that Matthew was writing form,
          and which is still significant for our own community
                   gathered here in Bloomsbury today.
 
When the gospel comes to tell of Jesus’ final meal with his disciples,
          it speaks of him taking bread, blessing it,
          breaking it, and distributing it (26.26).
 
When Christians gather, as we have this morning,
          to break bread, and share in it together,
we enact not just the last supper itself,
          but also all that comes before it.
 
The last supper that Jesus Shared with the disciples,
          was the Passover meal.
 
It was the meal at which the story was remembered and retold,
          of how the Lord led the people of Israel out of Egypt,
          through the wilderness, sustained by manna and quail,
          to the promised land.
 
The Passover meal was a meal of liberation,
          of celebration that slavery was ended.
 
And Matthew wants his readers to realise
          that when they celebrate the Lord’s supper together,
they are aligning themselves with the great tradition of God’s people,
          a tradition stretching back through Babylon, wilderness, and Egypt,
a tradition of being a people of liberation.
 
The Lord’s supper is a meal of manumission,
          it is a eucharist of emancipation.
And those who celebrate it do so to receive the Spirit of Jesus,
          as the elders received the spirit of Moses.
As they eat together their compassion and commission are renewed,
          and they take upon themselves the call to feed the crowds,
          to invite those who are still enslaved
                   to join the final feast of freedom
                   that God is preparing for all peoples (Isa 25.6; Matt 8.11-12). [2]
 
So, where does this leave us, today,
          as we gather around the table of the Lord’s supper,
          having heard once again the stories of the marketplace in Babylon,
                   of the exodus from Egypt,
                             and of bread and fishes on a hillside in Palestine?
 
Well, firstly it strikes me that it is a matter of supreme irony
          that the current political nation defined as Israel
is involved in a systematic programme of destruction
          against another people group.
The people of slavery and oppression have become transposed,
          and the people of God should not ignore this.
 
But secondly, it makes me wonder whether slavery in some form
          is the inevitable end result of capitalism?
I find myself despairing
          at the seemingly inevitable commodification of humanity,
          where people are reduced to objects
                   for trading, use, and abuse.
 
And I find myself wondering what this miracle of the fish and loaves
          might say to a world that is seduced by increasing consumption.
 
What happens when Jesus gives more than anyone needs?
 
What might happen if the people of God
          learn to care more for needs of the individual,
          than for the good of the market as a whole?
 
I wonder what it would do to our models
          of consumption, consumerism, and commodification,
if those who have received the Spirit of Christ
          were to echo in their lives
          the miraculous distribution of food on the hillside in Palestine.
 
I wonder what it would do to structures of subjugation
          and systems of societal oppression
if resources were to be shared,
          so that each received sufficient
          to free them from economic enslavement,
whilst those who have more than enough
          are freed from the consumerist compulsion
          to multiply their own stockpile ad infinitum.
 
But thirdly, we who are called to freedom
          cannot avoid that most difficult of questions:
                   Where is God in a time of slavery?
 
This is the question that so readily confronts those who are enslaved,
          and which is so readily avoided by those who are not.
 
It's all too easy to believe in God
          when everything is going your way.
 
But it is very hard to believe in God,
          or to know where God fits into the scheme of life,
when everything has gone wrong,
          when everything you thought you believed in,
                   every certainty that you hold dear,
          has been ripped away from you.
 
Where is God when there is nothing left?
          Where is God when people abuse you?
          Where is God when people defeat you?
          Where is God when people take you away from your home
                   and make you live in a foreign land
                   surrounded by those who seek only to do you harm?
 
This is the question of the exiles in Babylon,
          the question of the slaves in Egypt,
          and it is a question with the most surprising of answers.
 
Because God, it seems, is right there in the midst of it all,
          not turning away from the horror and loneliness and terror,
                   not rising above such banalities,
          but entering into the depth of human suffering,
                   becoming at one with those who face death.
 
And out of this identification comes transformation:
          death does not get the last word on life!
The cross is not the end,
          freedom is coming.
 
The one who goes to the cross
          is the same one who lifts up his hands to multiply the loaves,
          and he is the same one who lifts up his voice
                   to invite outcasts and strangers to join him
                   at the table of the banquet of the kingdom of God.
 
Come, he says, come eat without cost,
          come, drink without charge.
 
How can this be?
          It is so because the people of God make it so.
We proclaim the in-breaking kingdom of God,
          and then we live as if it is so, until it is so.
 
There is good news in the gospel to those in slavery,
          and it is good news mediated
          through those of us who share the spirit of Christ.
 
The call on the people of God, on all of us who gather around this table today,
          is to repeat the mantra of Moses in the wilderness,
          to reiterate the message of the prophet in Babylon,
          to relive the multiplication of loaves and fishes in Palestine.
 
We are called to proclaim freedom for all,
          and to live that freedom into being by our lives.
 
So we campaign against injustice,
          and we join our voices with others
          that together we might make a compelling sound that cannot be ignored.
 
And we support those who work for peace and justice and reconciliation,
          as we become people who are passionate about other people.
 
And we resist the lie that one human life is worth more than another,
          as we learn to recognise the image of God in each created being.
 
So we come:
          we come to this table,
          we come to eat, to drink,
                   freely, and without charge.
 
We come to be changed, to be transformed,
          to become people of freedom,
                    people of liberation,
                             people of action.
We come to receive the spirit of Moses,
          to receive the Spirit of Christ,
                   to learn once again the words of the prophet in Babylon.
 
So come, to the table of the banquet of the kingdom of God.
 


[1] Roots Worship, 3 August 2014, p. 22
[2] Roots Worship, 3 August 2014, p. 22

Tuesday 6 June 2023

An Incompetent Messiah?

A sermon for Bloomsbury Central Baptist Church
11 June 2023





Isaiah 9.1-7
Matthew 4.12-25
 
Just this last week I was contacted by the London Baptists,
          as it is time for the 5-yearly renewal of my DBS Safeguarding form.
 
I’m very glad that our Baptist family take such things so seriously,
          as of course do we here at Bloomsbury:
we make every effort to ensure
          that all those who work and volunteer in our church communities
          are not unsuitable for the roles they fill.
 
But of course, a prior criminal conviction isn’t the whole story,
          and a few years ago now,
                    the Baptist Union were trying to get to grips with the fact
          that some of their accredited Baptist Ministers
                    were simply not up to the task.
 
Research had revealed that there were a disturbing minority of ministers
          who, over several decades, moved from church to church
wreaking havoc and destruction in each successive community,
          before moving on to the next one.
 
Most of these people never did anything
          that warranted their dismissal from ministry,
          nothing that would ever show up on a DBS form;
rather they were just the wrong person for that role.
 
In an attempt to address this,
          the Baptist Union published a document
defining what core competencies for ministry should look like.
 
It included things like preaching, pastoral visiting, administration,
          leading meetings, leading public worship, using IT, and the like.
I have the list somewhere.
 
And clearly, if a minister is incompetent in such things,
          they probably should get some training or find another career.
 
But the problem was that this list didn’t really address
          the deep-seated personality traits and flaws
          that characterised the serial-church-destroyers.
 
It didn’t address the subtle tendency to bullying,
          often disguised as pastoral care;
it didn’t address the empire-building mind-set
          fuelled by macho conversations in ministers’ meetings,
where mostly male ministers boast
          about who has the largest… church!
 
Against this, Ruth Gouldbourne, formerly of this parish,
          gave a lecture at the Baptist Assembly,
which she provocatively entitled,
          ‘In Praise of Incompetence’.
 
She starts by making it very clear that she isn’t arguing
          that ministers should be incompetent in the essentials.
But rather, that competence in these things
          does not equate with competence for ministry.
 
So she asks: What is a minister? What is a minister for?
 
Let me read a paragraph for you:
 
Being skilled and competent matters.
 
Skills and competences will sustain us
          through significant parts of our daily activities.
They will allow our congregations the relaxation
          of knowing they can trust us and not to worry about us or for us.
 
But if skills and competences define our ministry,
          we run the risk of fearing to go beyond what we know we can do,
          what we are confident we can accomplish –
and our activity and service become what we can do
          rather than our openness to what the Spirit is doing through us.
 
It is in our incompetence, our unskilledness
          beyond who we think we are and what we think we can safely do –
it is there I suggest that we discover the country of the Spirit’s ministry
          and the transformational activity of the everlasting Love.
 
          - Ruth Gouldbourne, In Praise of Incompetence
 
Well, things have moved on,
          and to an extent Ruth won the argument.
 
These days, whilst competence still matters,
          there is also a recognition that there are other qualities of leadership
                   that matter equally if not more,
          and which cannot be measured in the same way.
 
So those of us who serve churches through offering leadership and ministry
          are invited by the Baptist Union to engage in a process
          of Continuous Ministerial Development.
 
This is not unlike what many of you will have experienced
          as CPD in a professional context,
and it engages with the intangibles as well as the tangibles.
 
For example, it encourages us to have a Spiritual Director,
          a Mentor, or a Pastoral Supervisor;
it encourages us to read and think, to take further training,
          to engage in regular processes of review and consideration.
 
And this is all to the good, and I welcome it.
 
But just as Ruth pushed back in 2008
          against the definition of ministry as competency,
so I want to ask a question of the process
          of Continuous Ministerial Development.
 
And my question relates to a truism,
          which whilst not always true,
          is true often enough for there to be truth in it.
 
The truism is this:
          ‘Churches get the ministers that they deserve’. [1]
 
Not always, of course.
          And we can immediately think of exceptions.
 
But I do think we need to pay attention to the role of the church,
          to the actions and influence of those in the congregation,
if we are to have any chance of assessing the significance
          of an individual minister’s contribution.
 
In large parts of the US, there is now a hire-and-fire approach to ministry,
          with growth targets and short-term contracts.
If you’re the minister of a church such as that,
          it will certainly shape the way you lead!
 
But even here in the UK, in less obvious and more subtle ways,
          congregations shape their ministers.
 
Sometimes this is a glorious process of mutual growth,
          but sometimes it can be a process of destructive dysfunction,
as a minority of congregations
          grind down successive ministers until they leave.
 
Now, you may wonder why I’ve started
          with these reflections on the nature of leadership,
as we come to our text today from Isaiah?
 
And the reason is this:
          Isaiah, in our passage for this morning,
                   creates a culture of messianic expectation
                   around the leadership of Israel.
 
He sets up a situation which leaves the people longing for the perfect leader,
          waiting desperately for God’s messiah
          to come and sort out their mess.
 
And yet their experience was that for leader after leader,
          from prophets to judges to kings,
the nation found itself disappointed,
          as leader after leader failed to deliver.
 
No-one ever lived up to the idealised standards
          of the great king David of old.
 
We’re going to take a dive into this passage and its context now,
          and as we do so I invite us to think
          about what it is that we expect from our leaders:
                   whether in church life, political life,
                   in your workplace, your family system,
          wherever those leaders may be.
 
Do we compare them against the great leaders of old,
          against whose standards they will never measure up?
 
Do we constantly hope that the next leader
          will be ‘the one’ to fulfil our dreams?
 
And let us hold in our minds the possibility that, sometimes,
          unrealistic expectations might be a factor
          in that person’s failure to live up to their promise.
 
And so, to Isaiah.
 
In last week’s sermon we were introduced to the context of the book of Isaiah,
          and we heard how he is a prophet to the Southern Kingdom
          at a time when the Northern Kingdom has been invaded by the Assyrians.
 
The historical backdrop here
          is that the Northern Kingdom had recently been laid waste
                   and occupied by the Assyrians.
The twelve tribes of Israel had been reduced
          to just the southern land allocated to the tribe of Judah,
          with Jerusalem as its capital.
 
David’s city and Solomon’s temple still stood,
          but most of the land they had ruled was now lost;
and Isaiah was prophesying to the people of Jerusalem
          at a time where they must have been wondering
          if it was their turn next for invasion and destruction.
 
Would the Assyrians keep pushing south to take Jerusalem and Judah,
          or would some other power swoop in and swallow them up?
 
Isaiah’s time was certainly a time of gloom in Jerusalem,
          with the dark clouds of war gathering on the horizon;
a time of threat and anguish,
          of oppressive empires and frightening armies.
 
And Isaiah can see that the writing is on the wall for the South.
          Much of his prophecy is taken up
          with warning Jerusalem of a coming disaster.
 
But then, here in chapter 9,
          we have this fascinating, compelling, surprising message of hope.
 
‘One is coming…’, Isaiah said,
          coming to this people who are now walking in darkness.
‘A child will be born…’, he said,
          who will be a true son of David.
 
And so Isaiah created a hope
          that this coming king would re-establish David’s throne,
would succeed where all the previous kings since Solomon had failed,
          by overthrowing Israel’s occupying enemies,
          by restoring the nation’s borders to their fullest extent,
          by ushering in a new golden age of peace and prosperity
                   over which he would reign with justice and righteousness
                   as a kingdom of endless peace.
 
Well: news flash, it didn’t happen that way.
 
It wasn’t long before the Babylonians
          were the new ascendant power in the region, displacing the Assyrians,
and they were the ones who invaded Judah,
          sacking Jerusalem, destroying the temple,
          and carrying off many Israelites into exile in Babylon.
 
But Isaiah’s words of hope for a coming messiah endured.
 
This hope went with the Israelites into exile,
          it took deep root in their psyche,
          and it became a part of their hope for God’s future for their people.
 
The people of Israel clung to Isaiah’s hope for an idealised king,
          a new ‘son of David’ who would do again in Israel
          what David of old had achieved in the distant past.
 
You may remember that I’ve sometimes drawn a parallel
          between the way King David functioned for Israel,
          and the way King Arthur functioned for England in the Middle Ages.
 
Both are kings from the mythic histories of their two respective nations,
          and the stories told about them
          functioned to shape those national identities for centuries.
 
King David’s stories spoke to Israel of a dream for a united kingdom,
          stretching from the North to the South,
          from the Mediterranean in the east
                   to beyond the Jordan in the west.
 
And similarly, King Arthur’s stories spoke to Medieval England
          of the importance of the values of chivalry
          in shaping the nation of the English-speaking peoples.
 
But there is another parallel
          between the mythologies of King Arthur and King David,
and it speaks to our passage today from Isaiah.
 
There is a prophesy in the Arthur legend that he will one day return,
          to save the people of England in their hour of greatest need.
 
Similarly, what we find here in Isaiah
          is a prophecy about King David,
that one day a child would be born
          who would be the true ‘son of David’,
          who would take his rightful place on the throne of his ancestor David.
 
Messianic expectation, whether at a national or local level,
          can be a compelling narrative to live by.
 
It keeps people hoping that salvation is just around the next corner,
          that the next leader will be the one to usher in the new age.
 
And so we come to our second reading,
          to the story of Jesus going to live for a while in Capernaum,
          in the region known as Galilee of the Gentiles.
 
Did you notice that Matthew specifically mentioned
          that Capernaum is in the territory of Zebulun and Naphtali?
The same two tribes mentioned by Isaiah
          at the beginning of his messianic vision.
 
There’s something going on here, and it’s worth exploring.
 
We need to remember that in these biblical narratives,
          geography isn’t accidental.
The relationship between the people of Israel and the land of Israel
          was so intertwined that the land and people were inextricably linked.
 
So for Isaiah, the land of Zebulun and Naphtali
          was the land Israel lost to the Assyrians.
It was the land of darkness, the land of anguish,
          the land of oppression, the land of contempt.
 
It was to the people who suffered in Zebulun and Naphtali
          that Isaiah addressed his message of hope:
that one day there would be no more gloom,
          that they would be glorious again,
                   led by a bright light that shines in their darkness,
          living with joy and rejoicing,
                   with the symbols of oppression broken and burned.
 
So when Matthew says that Jesus goes to live there,
          this is no accident.
 
Matthew has Isaiah’s prophecy firmly in mind
          as he describes the beginning of Jesus’ public ministry.
 
He has Jesus move into the neighbourhood
          of the suffering and the outcast peoples.
 
He has Jesus locate himself in Gentile territory.
 
Even before calling his first disciples,
          Matthew shows Jesus enacting the truth
                   that his ministry will be for all nations,
          for those who sit in darkness,
                   for those who live under the shadow of death.
 
The early followers of Jesus
          found the messianic hope articulated by Isaiah
          to be helpful in understanding the life and ministry of Jesus,
and we see this as Matthew quotes directly from Isaiah chapter 9,
          locating Jesus as the one who fulfils
                   the long-awaited messianic expectation
          that had come down through Israel from the time of Isaiah,
                   through the years of exile in Babylon,
                   through the centuries of occupation under successive foreign powers,
                   to the time of Israel under the Romans,
                             the time of Jesus.
 
But there is a significant difference
          between the way Matthew and the other gospel writers
          portray Jesus as the fulfilment of messianic expectation,
and the way Isaiah set things up six centuries before.
 
Clearly Jesus was not the political messiah
          that Isaiah had longed for.
 
When Jesus went to Jerusalem it was not to take David’s throne,
          overthrow the oppressor, and re-establish the kingdom of Israel.
It was to die willingly as a martyr at the hands of the invading army of Rome.
 
But nonetheless, Matthew and the other early Christians
          saw a deeper truth in Isaiah’s words
which spoke to them of the hope that entered the world at the birth of Jesus.
 
Not a nationalistic hope of restored borders and defeated enemies,
          but a hope that reached beyond Israel, beyond the Jordan,
          to encompass all people.
 
A hope of sins forgiven, of broken relationships restored,
          of a vision of humanity where all are equal, and all are equally loved,
a hope of an end to the power of death to dominate people’s lives.
 
Isaiah’s vision of a son of David coming to Israel,
          becomes in the hands of the early Christians
a far more wide-ranging hope
          of a world transformed through the birth of Jesus.
 
Those who hailed Jesus as the Messiah
          had to learn a new way of understanding their hope for the future.
They had to let go of their unrealistic expectations,
          their unfulfilled dreams of nationalistic restoration, and political success.
 
They had to realise that their messiah
          would not look like they thought he would,
          and would not act as they wanted him to.
 
They had to relinquish their deeply held hopes,
          and embrace instead a messiah who came to suffer, to die,
          to embody the incompetence of failure.
 
Because it is in that moment of ultimate vulnerability
          that God is finally and fully encountered.
 
It is in Jesus that God is incarnated to humanity.
 
It is the birth, life, and death of Jesus
          that brings into being the definitive moment
                   of God reaching out, to touch our lives
                   in every area of our existence,
          bringing healing, restoration, and transformation.
 
God does not come in Christ to fight all our battles,
          defeat all our enemies, and give us the gift of happily ever after.
 
Rather, in Christ God draws alongside us;
          in Jesus God moves into our neighbourhood,
                   meeting us in our failure, our sin, and our incompetence;
          forgiving us and drawing us
                   into a new relationship of acceptance and love.
 
And it is also in Jesus
          that we find the fulfilment of Isaiah’s hope for a reign of eternal peace,
where the justice and righteousness longed for by the prophet Amos,
          and prophesied by Isaiah,
become a reality in the lives of those
          who find their reconciliation with God through Jesus.
 
And so as we think about what it means for us
          to proclaim Christ’s kingdom of peace in a world of conflict,
I wonder what does it mean for us
          to long for peace in a world of war?
 
What is the point of lighting our peace candle each week?
 
Does that small glimmer of light really shine in any meaningful way
          on those who live in the land of deep darkness?
 
The reality of history is that warfare never really ends,
          it just moves elsewhere for a while.
 
But in Christ comes the gift of peace.
 
Peace-making is an ongoing task.
          It requires commitment, and faithfulness, and hard work.
 
But in Christ we are brought into a peaceful relationship with God,
          and like the stillness at the centre of a hurricane,
the peace that we have with God
          is a still centre in the midst of a chaotic world.
 
We carry within us, each of us, the candle of peace.
          And that light lightens the world,
          because it is the light of Christ within us.
 
As we learn to live peaceably with others,
          the light that guides us also shines on those who still walk in darkness.
It is as we follow the path of Christ,
          responding to the call of Christ on our lives,
          that the light of Christ shines in the world.
 
The peaceful kingdom may not yet be fully realised, but it has begun,
          and it is with us here today, and it is within us.
 
The people who walked in darkness have seen a great light;
          those who lived in a land of deep darkness-- on them light has shined.


[1] This is a paraphrase of the quote by Joseph de Maistre (1753-1821) that Toute nation a le gouvernement qu'elle mérite. Every nation gets the government it deserves.