A sermon for Bloomsbury Central Baptist Church
20th February 2022
Exodus 17.1-7
Isaiah 12.2-4
John 7.37-52
In our reading for today, from John’s gospel,
we’re returning to a theme we first met a few weeks ago,
when we were with the Samaritan woman
encountering Jesus in the heat of the day beside Jacob’s Well.
In that moment, Jesus told the woman
that those who drink the water from the well will be thirsty again,
but those who drink of the water that he gives
will find that it becomes in them a spring of water,
gushing up to eternal life (4.13-14).
And I shared the words of a friend of mine,
spoken as we had stood around the fountain at St Dunstan in the East,
as she wondered, ‘well, who wouldn’t want that for their life?’
This is a fine question, and an important challenge:
Jesus offers us a way of living that is like a spring of water
gushing from the ground to give life to all who drink from it.
And John’s gospel could have left it there,
and moved on to other metaphors for the new life that Jesus brings,
such as light, or bread, or vines, or shepherds, or doors…
But instead, just three chapters later,
the gospel returns us to the theme of water.
There is more, it seems, that we need to discover and think about
if we are to get to grips with the true significance
of Jesus as the water of life.
By the time we get to chapter 7, Jesus has gone back down to Jerusalem,
this time for the great Jewish festival of Booths,
sometimes also known as the feast of Tabernacles, or Sukkot.
This festival was a kind of harvest festival,
but with added layers of symbolism,
and understanding a bit about it can help us
begin to get to grips with what Jesus is saying here in John 7.
At one level, the festival of Booths marked the end of the autumn harvest,
with people making a pilgrimage to give thanks
for the ripening of the grapes and olives,
and to offer their prayers to God for the start of the rainy season,
without which there would be no harvest the following year.
A winter of drought could be catastrophic,
and the autumn rains literally brought life to the land and the people.
The final day of the festival, on which John tells us
Jesus gave his discourse about living water,
was the day of the ‘water ritual’,
where the high priest would walk from the Temple to the pool of Siloam
to collect a pitcher of water,
which would then be poured onto the altar in the temple
as part of the prayers for life-giving rain.
This is, then, the first layer of meaning
that we are invited to see in Jesus’ talk of himself
as the source of living water,
and I think it speaks down the millennia to us, too.
As I’m sure Matthew could explain far better than I,
we live in a world where the future well-being of humanity
is going to be affected profoundly by issues around water supply and scarcity.
As climate change continues its inexorable transformation of our planet,
and desertification makes previously habitable areas
inhospitable to life and agriculture,
we too, or at least our children and grandchildren,
may find themselves again offering prayers for rain and an end to drought.
And as is so often the case with prayer,
it may be that the answer is before us already, at least in part.
There is a need for urgent adaptation,
for a re-thinking of the relationship between our planet and its inhabitants,
if death and disruption on a global scale are to be avoided.
From the decarbonisation of the global economy,
to planning now for the changes
that are already locked-in to our climate systems,
we need a new and better way of being human,
where the resources of our planet are treasured and conserved, r
ather than taken for granted and exploited.
And water supply will be at the heart of this.
Without water there will be no life, no crops, no civilisation.
Jem Bendell, in his 2018 paper ‘Deep Adaptation’,
adopts a prophetic voice in calling humanity
to resilience, relinquishment, restoration, and reconciliation.
To which I would add, I think, repentance.
Resilience will come as we decide what we value most
and how we want to preserve it;
relinquishment will be the letting go of what is not needed
or which makes things worse;
restoration will be the rediscovery of better ways of living with nature
which have been set aside in recent centuries;
reconciliation is a call to move towards peace and away from conflict
as we adapt to a new world;
and repentance will be a recognition that those economies
who have reaped the greatest rewards from the burning of hydrocarbons
must take the greatest share of responsibility for driving change.
And as the people of God,
the church needs to hear again the words of Jesus
who spoke to a world of drought,
to proclaim that anyone who is thirsty should come to him and drink;
that from his heart, and the hearts of his followers,
shall flow rivers of living water.
We should not seek to spiritualise this away.
There is a spiritual dimension to it, which we will come to;
but if the people of God are not engaged in the climate crisis,
calling humanity to a better way of being human,
and working to bring that new humanity which is in Christ
into being in our world,
then we are missing a key aspect of what Jesus is saying.
We are those who can call the world to a Just Transition,
because we do not ultimately answer
to extractive systems of production, consumption,
and political oppression.
Rather, we answer to the lordship of Christ, the source of life,
and so we can prophetically embody
resilient, regenerative, and equitable living,
where the transition to a post-carbon world
places concerns of race, gender, and poverty
at the centre of the solution’s equation.
As a church here at Bloomsbury
we are already Eco-church accredited to a Bronze award,
and it is my hope that we can achieve
silver and gold accreditation before too long.
And some of us are already involved through London Citizens
in the Just Transition campaign for London to prioritise
the needs of those living in fuel poverty
as the city decarbonises over the next decade.
If you want to be part of these with me,
please speak to me and together we can work out what it means
for us, in our context, to be a stream of living water
for the thirsty in our world.
But there is a second layer to the festival of Booths,
and it invites us to take Jesus’ words to another level too.
You see, the festival wasn’t just about the harvest and the autumn rains.
It was also a specific remembrance of the exodus.
You know the story;
the people of Israel were led by Moses from slavery in Egypt,
through the waters of the Red Sea,
into 40 years of wandering in the wilderness,
before finally settling in the promised land.
In the desert of the wilderness
they had need for sustenance, and need for shelter.
We have already seen how the language of Jesus as the bread of life
recalls the bread-like manna from heaven
that the Israelites gathered from the desert floor each day to feed themselves;
and here in the festival of Booths
as the setting for Jesus’ sermon on living water,
we encounter yet more Exodus imagery.
The booths or tabernacles
in which the festival-attendees stayed for the week,
were temporary structures
that echoed the temporary and portable housing
in which the people of Israel lived through their decades of desert wandering;
and the water ceremony on the final day
recalled the striking of a stream of water from the rock at Horeb,
as the staff of Moses that had parted the waters of the Red Sea
was used to part rock and bring forth life giving water into the desert.
This theme of water in unexpected places
echoed into the spiritual imagination of Israel,
and became a recurring symbol for the life-giving,
saving power of God.
So in Ezekiel’s vision,
a prophecy given to the Israelites in exile in Babylon,
following the destruction of the first Jerusalem temple
at the hands of the invading army,
the prophet describes a restored temple,
with water flowing from below the threshold of the temple
to fill a vast lake, teeming with life,
making the stagnant waters into which it flows
fresh enough to sustain fish,
irrigating the land so that trees grow
whose leaves never wither and whose fruit never fails,
because the water that sustains them
flows from the sanctuary of God in the temple itself.
Here in Ezekiel, the image of a life-giving stream of water
becomes a symbol for a restored Israel,
for the end of exile and the rebuilding of the temple (Ez. 47.1-12).
But Ezekiel’s vision is far wider than just Israel:
the restoration of the people of God is, he says,
to be a blessing for all people,
for the lands beyond Jerusalem and Judea.
Ezekiel speaks of
the fruit of the trees that grow from the water’s edge
as being for food,
and of the leaves as being for healing (47.12).
This image finds its way into the Christian tradition in the book of Revelation,
another visionary text written for people of faith
facing difficulty and oppression.
In Revelation, written just after
the destruction of the second Jerusalem temple by the Romans,
there is also a vision of a restored Jerusalem,
and like Ezekiel’s temple this one also
has a stream of water running through it.
In Revelation’s reworking of this image, though,
there is an important difference.
Whereas in Ezekiel the water flowed from the sanctuary in the temple,
the new Jerusalem in Revelation has no temple.
Rather, the river of the water of life, bright as crystal,
flows directly from the throne of God and the lamb, that is, Jesus (22.1).
In the Christian visionary tradition then,
Jesus has taken the place of the temple sanctuary
as the source of life-giving water in the world.
Like Ezekiel’s vision,
the river of life in Revelation also irrigates a tree,
described as the tree of life
and, as in Ezekiel, its leaves are also described as being for healing:
‘for the healing of the nations’ (22.2).
Jerusalem as a city famously had no natural water supply,
but in the visions of both Ezekiel and John of Patmos
it becomes a source of life-giving water
flowing from the heart of the people of God
to bring life to the world and healing to the nations.
From Horeb to Babylon to Patmos,
the water of life is a gift from God
given through the faithful as a gift to those in need.
And all of this is in the background
to John’s description of Jesus in Jerusalem
on the final day of the great feast,
as the high priest went to the pool of Siloam
to collect the water that would be poured out on the altar.
Those who are thirsty,
whose souls are parched and whose spirits are desiccated,
are invited to drink deeply from the well of life-giving water
that has come into being in Jesus, the word of God made flesh.
From Jesus’ heart, and from the hearts of all who believe,
shall flow rivers of life-giving water.
And here we come to the third, most spiritual, layer of meaning
in this sermon from Jesus on living water:
the water of life is encountered in the world
as the Spirit of Christ.
Today is not the day for me to explore
the rights and wrongs of the Nicene creed and the filioque controversy,
but it is worth our while noting
that the 1,000-year global division of Christianity
into two traditions, of East and West,
owes much to this passage,
and to the debate over whether the Holy Spirit
should be understood as proceeding into the world from the Father alone,
or from the Father and the Son together.
We’ll save more on that for another day.
But it is interesting to note, I think,
that this idea of Jesus, present to the world as life-giving water,
through the gift of the Holy Spirit to his followers,
was controversial not just in historic Trinitarian debates,
but also for those in Jerusalem who first heard him make this claim.
His proclamation of the gift of the Spirit as a stream of living water
unmasked all kinds of prejudice and bigotry
in those gathered around him on this final day of the festival of Booths.
We see racial prejudice,
geographic and class-based prejudice (41, 42, 52);
we see false accusations seeking to silence someone
who has tried to speak out, tentatively, for justice (52);
and we see a tendency to disregard the rule of law (51),
the role of the police (45-47),
and a desire for mob justice to overcome.
It all feels frighteningly contemporary.
I’ve just been listening to a fascinating podcast on BBC Sounds
called ‘Things Fell Apart’
in which the journalist Jon Ronson
explores the origins of the culture wars
that currently dominate social media.
It has been salutary to discover
how often Christians have been the originators or instigators
of social movements that have oppressed, and continue to oppress,
the lives of countless people.
From the pro-life movement,
to anti-Trans activism, to the Q Anon conspiracy,
to cancel culture, to racist bullying on Snapchat,
Christians do not have a proud record of tolerance and justice.
My own recent negative experience
at the hands of hostile Christians online
has left me both shaken but also somewhat despairing,
that those whose hearts are supposed to bring forth
the life-giving water of the Holy Spirit as a blessing to the world,
and as a gift of healing to the nations, the climate, and the planet;
have instead become the self-imposed gate-keepers of orthodoxy
in ways that divide, demean, and destroy.
Friends, this call to be the bearers
of the water of the Spirit of life to the world
is not an abstract calling.
It is not something we can or should
try to do alone or in secret.
Rather, it is a call to collective action;
it’s a call to build communities of love and acceptance
and to offer them as a gift to all
who are longing for somewhere to belong;
it is a call to engage in acts of justice,
building creation-centred communities
with a bias to the poor;
it is a call to challenge any system, whether secular or religious,
which excludes or perpetuates injustice.
It is, therefore, a call to controversy and to courage;
but it is also a call to generosity, to healing,
to love, and to life.
Let anyone who is thirsty come, and drink.
No comments:
Post a Comment