Like many apparently simple
questions, it conceals a tangle of assumptions. Before rushing to an answer, it
is worth slowing down and asking what we mean by “God”, by “worship”, and by
“the same”.
From a Christian theological
perspective, one starting point is humility. If God is truly God, then no
religion possesses God in full. Every tradition speaks about the divine from
within particular histories, languages, cultures, and experiences. All theological
language is provisional. We speak truthfully, but not exhaustively. As Paul
puts it, we see in a mirror dimly. That applies just as much to Christianity as
to any other faith.
At the same time, religions are
not simply interchangeable. They make real and sometimes incompatible claims.
Jews do not confess Jesus as Messiah. Muslims reject the doctrine of the
Trinity. Christians claim that God is decisively revealed in the life, death,
and resurrection of Jesus. These differences matter. To pretend otherwise is
not respectful pluralism but a flattening of real faith commitments.
So are we talking about the
same God, or not?
One helpful distinction is
between referent and understanding. Two people can be pointing to
the same reality while describing it very differently. A child, a poet, and a
physicist may all be speaking about the sun, but their accounts will not sound
alike. The differences do not mean they are talking about entirely different
objects.
Judaism, Christianity, and
Islam clearly intend to refer to the same God: the originator of heaven and
earth, the God of Abraham, the one who delivers slaves from bondage and calls
people to justice and mercy. Historically and theologically, it is hard to deny
this shared referent, even though the understandings of that God diverge in
profound ways.
Once we move beyond the
Abrahamic traditions, things become more complex. Hindu traditions, for
example, encompass a vast range of understandings of ultimate reality, from
personal deities to impersonal absolute being. Some strands of Hindu thought
might sit quite comfortably alongside Christian talk of God; others operate
with a very different metaphysical grammar. Buddhism, in many forms, does not
centre on God at all, but on liberation from suffering through awakening.
Asking whether Buddhists worship the same God can therefore be a category
mistake.
This suggests that the question
itself may not always be the most helpful one. It assumes that all religions
are primarily about “God” in the same way, which is not the case. Religions are
complex systems of practice, story, ethics, ritual, and community, not just
sets of propositions about the divine.
From a Christian point of view,
another crucial issue is revelation. Christians claim not simply that God
exists, but that God is known in particular ways. The claim that God is
revealed in Jesus is not a claim about religious superiority, but about the character
of God as Christians have come to know God. It is a confession of faith, not a
neutral observation. Other traditions will quite reasonably see things
differently.
The danger comes when such
confessions are turned into weapons. History shows how easily claims about God
slide into claims about power, purity, and exclusion. When Christians insist
that others do not worship the “true God”, this has often been less about
theological clarity and more about justifying domination, colonisation, or
violence. Any answer to this question that does not reckon with that history is
dangerously incomplete.
There is also a practical,
ethical dimension that cannot be ignored. Jesus teaches that we will know a
tree by its fruit. If people of different faiths are committed to compassion,
justice, truthfulness, and the dignity of their neighbours, Christians might
reasonably ask what it says about God that such fruits appear beyond the
boundaries of the church. This does not require abandoning Christian
convictions, but it does invite generosity about how God may be at work in the
world.
Perhaps a better way of framing
the issue is this: Christians worship God as revealed in Jesus. Other religions
reach towards the divine as they understand and experience it. Sometimes those
reachings overlap. Sometimes they diverge sharply. God is not confined to
Christian language, but neither is Christian language dispensable.
In that sense, the question
“Are all religions worshipping the same God?” admits of no simple yes or no. A
flat “yes” risks erasing real differences. A hard “no” risks shrinking God to
the size of our own doctrines.
A more faithful response might
be to say: God is one, human understandings are many, and our task is not to
police God’s boundaries but to bear truthful witness to what we have received,
while listening carefully and respectfully to others.
In a plural society, that
posture matters. It allows Christians to speak clearly about their faith
without denying the integrity of others. It makes space for dialogue without
collapsing into relativism. And it leaves room for the unsettling possibility that
God may surprise us, including through those who pray, worship, and live
differently from us.
That, perhaps, is not a neat
answer. But it may be a more honest one.
Further Reading: https://www.christianity.org.uk/article/are-all-religions-worshipping-the-same-god

No comments:
Post a Comment