Monday, 9 March 2026

What Kind of King Do We Want?

 A Sermon for Bloomsbury Central Baptist Church
15 March 2026,
Fourth Sunday in Lent

1 Samuel 8.4–20
John 18.28–40

We live in a world filled with leaders of every kind.
            Some rule with an iron fist,
                        demanding obedience and silencing dissent.
            Some charm the public with populist slogans,
                        offering simple solutions to complex problems,
                        while consolidating power in ways that serve themselves
                        more than the common good.
            Others operate as technocrats,
                        relying on expertise and efficiency,
                        yet often detached from the real lives of the people they govern.
            And in some parts of the world, outright dictators still claim authority
                        over every aspect of daily life,
                        using fear and force to maintain control.

When we read the story of Jesus before Pilate,
            it is impossible not to hear echoes of these dynamics.

Pilate represents the pragmatism and self-interest of worldly power.

The crowd chooses Barabbas,
            the insurrectionist who embodies the familiar logic of rebellion and force.

And yet Jesus introduces a different way of ruling,
            a kingship not built on domination, fear, or expedience,
            but on truth, humility, and self-giving love.

In Lent, we are invited to reflect on the kinds of leaders we follow,
            the powers we trust,
            and the kind of kingdom we want to belong to,
not just in politics, but in every part of life.

But first, let’s turn to the story in 1 Samuel 8,
            where we find a people wrestling with the same, age-old question:
            what kind of leadership do we want?

The Israelites had come to the prophet Samuel with a bold request:
            “Appoint for us a king to govern us like other nations.”

Their desire is simple and human.
            They want what every surrounding nation has.

They want a ruler who will lead armies into battle,
            defeat their enemies, project strength,
            and ensure the security of their people.

At first glance, this seems reasonable.
            After all, every nation has its king, so why should Israel be different?

They are looking for stability, for protection,
            for someone to guide them through a dangerous world.

But Samuel, the faithful prophet,
            sees more clearly than the people themselves.

He warns them about what kings actually do.
            He tells them that kingship comes at a cost.
Kings will take their sons for the army,
            sending them into battle, risking their lives.
A king will take their daughters for labour,
            and their fields, vineyards, and the best of the land
            to fill the king’s coffers and maintain their court.

Kings rule through extraction and control.
            The very systems that promise protection
            are the same systems that demand everything in return.

Samuel’s words are clear:
            a king will not simply serve the people.
He will consolidate power,
            extract resources, and enforce authority.

And yet the people insist.
            They do not want a prophet’s counsel.
They want power, they want security,
            they want a king like the nations around them.
They choose the politics of empire.

The human desire for domination,
            for a ruler who promises order,
            is stronger than their fear of oppression.
It is a depressing fact that sometimes
            people don’t vote in their own interest!

This moment in Israel’s history
            is more than a story of one people;
            it is a window into the human heart.

Even in our time, we want leaders who make life predictable.
            We want structures of power that promise safety.
And all too often, we do not pause to ask what such power costs.

The Israelites’ insistence reveals a tension
            that runs through human history:
the tension between our desire for control and our need for justice.

With this background in mind,
            the scene in John 18 becomes all the more striking.

Jesus, who has been teaching and healing,
            now stands before the Roman governor, Pontius Pilate.

The religious authorities have brought him here
            because only Rome can authorize execution.

And the question they ask is simple:
            “Are you the king of the Jews?”

On the surface, it seems like a straightforward political question.
            But in the ears of an empire,
            the word “king” carries weighty significance.

To Pilate, a king is a man who commands armies,
            enforces rule, crushes rivals,
            and threatens the authority of Rome.

The word is inseparable from rebellion,
            political upheaval, and potential violence.

When Pilate asks Jesus this question,
            he is not curious about theology.
He is asking about danger.
            Are you a revolutionary?
            Are you a threat to the Pax Romana, the fragile peace of Rome?

The empire knows exactly what kings are.
            And they do not tolerate rivals.
            They do not welcome dissent that could destabilize their rule.

Pilate, as governor, has inherited a system
            that measures kings in terms of military might,
            coercion, and political threat.

That is the lens through which he views Jesus.
            And yet Jesus does not answer in the way Pilate expects.

Jesus refuses to play the game.
            He doesn’t confirm the accusation,
            but nor does he deny it in the terms Pilate understands.

Instead, he offers a statement that unsettles the governor
            and shifts the conversation entirely:
“My kingdom is not from this world.”

At first hearing, this may sound like Jesus is speaking of something distant,
            something purely spiritual, detached from politics and daily life.

But in John’s Gospel, the phrase has a more precise meaning.
            It doesn’t deny that the kingdom is present in the world;
            rather it denies that the kingdom operates by the systems of domination
                        that define worldly power.

If Jesus’ kingdom were like the kingdoms Samuel warned about,
            if it depended on coercion or violence, he says,
            his followers would be fighting to defend it.
But they are not.

The logic of empire, the logic of kings who extract and control,
            does not govern the kingdom Jesus proclaims.

Jesus’ kingdom operates differently.
            It operates through truth and witness,
            through a demonstration of love and justice that does not rely on force.

The kings Samuel warned about rule through coercion.
            They demand obedience, loyalty, and resources,
            often at the expense of those they govern.

Jesus, in contrast, calls people to allegiance
            not through fear but through the witness of truth.

And here the encounter with Pilate reaches its profound moment.
            Jesus continues: “For this I was born… to testify to the truth.”

This is not an abstract philosophical truth.
            It is the truth about God’s character, about God’s purposes,
            about the way the world really works.

It is the revelation of reality that exposes the lies
            upon which systems of domination are built.

Where empires thrive on deception, manipulation, and control,
            Jesus offers clarity.

He reveals the hidden structures of power
            and shows a way of life that belongs not to coercion but to fidelity,
            not to violence but to witness, not to domination but to love.

Pilate’s response is a weary, almost cynical question:
            “What is truth?”
And he doesn’t even wait for an answer.

In Pilate, we see the pragmatism of empire.
            Stability matters more than justice.
            Order is more important than fidelity to truth.
Truth is inconvenient.
            It challenges authority, exposes hypocrisy, and demands action.

Pilate is not interested in these things.
            He represents the systems that Samuel warned about
                        and that Jesus critiques:
            structures that prioritise survival, appearances, and control
                        over the courageous pursuit of God’s way.

And yet even in Pilate’s pragmatism, there is recognition.
            He declares that he finds no guilt in Jesus.

He knows, at some level, that Jesus is innocent.
            But innocence is not enough.
The machinery of power must keep moving.
            The political system, the crowd, and the customs of the time
            push Pilate to act against his own judgment.

Truth alone cannot override the pressures of empire.
            So he allows the crowd to choose,
                        and they release Barabbas, the known rebel,
            and hand Jesus over for crucifixion.

Here, the tragic irony is complete.
            The human instinct to protect the familiar,
            to embrace the logic of domination,
leads to the rejection of the king who embodies truth and justice.

In reflecting on these two readings together,
            the contrast is stark.

Israel demanded a king like the nations,
            and the people of Jerusalem chose a leader
            who promised the familiar comforts of rebellion and force.

And yet the king who stands before Pilate
            offers something radically different.

He invites us into a kingdom
            that does not follow the patterns of coercion, control, and extraction.
He calls us to a life shaped by witness, truth, and sacrificial love.

In both passages, we see the human tendency
            to seek security and power at any cost.
In both passages, God offers something unexpected:
            a vision of kingship rooted not in fear and domination,
            but in faithfulness, truth, and grace.

This is where Lent brings us,
            in the middle of the wilderness of human desire and political ambition.

Lent reminds us that following Christ
            often means standing apart from the logic of the world.
It means embracing a kingship that is humble,
            vulnerable, and countercultural.
It means choosing the truth,
            even when it is inconvenient, uncomfortable, and costly.

And it invites the church to consider:
            which kingdom do we belong to?
The kingdom of extraction, coercion, and fear?
            Or the kingdom of truth, love, and witness?

When Pilate offers the crowd a choice,
            the moment feels, on the surface, almost ceremonial.

He presents these two prisoners:
            Jesus, the one who stands accused but is innocent,
            and Barabbas, a known insurrectionist.

Barabbas is not a criminal in the narrow sense;
            rather he is someone who embraces the familiar logic of violent rebellion,
            he’s a freedom fighter who offered the kind of leadership
            that the people understand and expect.

In that moment, the crowd’s choice is revealing.
            They choose Barabbas.
They reject the king who embodies humility, truth, and self-giving love,
            and instead take the path of strength, force, and control.

The echo of 1 Samuel 8 is unmistakable.
            Just as Israel demanded a king like the nations,
            so the people of Jerusalem, confronted with the kingdom of God in Jesus,
            turn toward the kind of power they know,
                        power that promises security but depends on domination.

This choice is both tragic and deeply instructive.
            Human beings are drawn to the familiar.
We are drawn to systems of authority that we can recognise and predict,
            even if they exploit or oppress.

Strength, force, and control feel safe
            because they are measurable, visible, and immediate.

Love, sacrifice, and truth, by contrast, demand something of us.
            They require courage, attentiveness,
            and a willingness to step outside the logic of the world.

In choosing Barabbas,
            the crowd chooses the familiar over the unfamiliar,
            coercion over witness,
            domination over the quiet but transformative power of Christ’s kingship.

And yet, Jesus embodies a completely different kind of kingship.

He does not respond with domination or violence.
            He does not demand allegiance through coercion or fear.
Instead, he rules through truth, humility, sacrificial love,
            and faithfulness even unto death.

The king of the Gospel does not take life; he gives it.
            His reign is revealed not in the force of arms
                        or the accumulation of power,
            but in the way he faces suffering, injustice,
                        and betrayal with steadfast love.

The cross, the ultimate moment of weakness in human eyes,
            becomes the supreme manifestation of his kingship.
It is there, in the seeming defeat of Calvary,
            that the world sees the power of the kingdom that is not of this world.

The readings we have considered this morning
            confront us with a question that is uncomfortably direct:
            what kind of king do we want?

Do we want the kings that Samuel warned us about,
            kings who promise security, order, and protection,
            but demand everything in return?

Or do we want the king who stands before Pilate,
            the one who embodies a kingdom ruled not through fear or domination,
            but through truth, integrity, and self-giving love?

The choice is not hypothetical.
            It is present in every aspect of our lives.

Every day, we face moments where we can choose coercion over compassion,
            power over justice, expedience over truth.

Following Jesus means making a different choice,
            choosing the kind of kingdom that transforms rather than controls.

To belong to the kingdom of Christ
            is to live according to a different logic than that of empire.

We do not advance the purposes of God
            through domination, manipulation, or fear.

Rather, we bear witness to truth, speak against injustice,
            and embody love in tangible, courageous ways.

This is the quiet power of the kingdom,
            the kind of power that does not scream, but persists.

It is visible in the patient work of reconciliation,
            in standing alongside the oppressed,
            in acts of generosity that cost us something.

It is the power that grows quietly,
            that transforms communities,
            and that shapes the world through fidelity rather than force.

And yet, it is not always easy.

The kingdom of God challenges the very structures and systems
            that we take for granted.

It calls us to reject familiar forms of authority,
            to see beyond the immediate and the pragmatic,
            to act in ways that seem foolish or weak to those
                        who measure success by domination.

Lent is a season that draws us into that reflection.
            It invites us to consider what we value,
                        what we depend upon,
            and what kind of allegiance we pledge.

It is a reminder that following Christ
            will often place us at odds with the powers that surround us,
            just as Jesus stood before Pilate.

In the Roman governor’s palace,
            two visions of power stand face to face.

Pilate represents the kingdoms of this world,
            where authority is measured by fear, violence, and control.

Jesus represents the kingdom of God,
            where authority is measured by truth, love, and faithfulness.

Pilate believes he holds power.
            He can release or condemn, control the narrative, and maintain order.

But the gospel quietly reveals the truth:
            the one who seems powerless
                        is the one whose kingdom will endure long after empires crumble.
            The one who is bound and mocked
                        is the one whose reign shapes the hearts and lives
                        of countless generations.

And the invitation remains open to us, even now.
            To follow Christ, to live as citizens of this kingdom,
            is to make a conscious choice to belong to truth.

Everyone who belongs to the truth listens to his voice.
            And it’s a voice that calls us
            to justice when the world favours oppression,
            to courage when the world favours convenience,
            and to love when the world favours fear.

The king who stands before Pilate is the one who shows us
            that the power of God’s kingdom is not in domination,
            but in the faithful witness of those who follow him.

And that is a kingdom worth following,
            worth embodying, and worth living into every day.

As we leave this place today,
            may we remember that Lent is a journey into that kingdom.

May we learn to recognise the subtle ways the world seduces us
            with the familiar paths of force and control.

And may we choose instead the way of Christ,
            the king who stands before Pilate,
            the king whose authority comes from truth, humility, and love.

May our lives bear witness to that kingdom,
            even in small acts, even in quiet courage,
            even in the ways we resist the easy, familiar path of domination.

And in doing so, may we join in the reign
            of the one whose kingdom will never end,
            and whose voice calls us to belong, now and always.

Let us pray.

Lord of truth and mercy,
            we stand before you in awe of the king
                        who does not wield power like the world,
            the one who bears witness to justice, love, and humility.

Give us courage to follow where Christ leads,
            to resist the easy paths of domination and fear,
            and to live lives shaped by truth, compassion, and sacrificial love.

Let your Spirit strengthen us to speak boldly, act faithfully,
            and bear witness to your kingdom in all we do.
May our hearts burn with the fire of your love
            and our minds be alert to the ways your justice calls us forward.

Through Christ, the King who reigns in truth and love, we pray.
Amen.

No comments: